This research aimed at studying the relationship between family socioeconomic, achievement goals, learning strategy and students, mathematical problem solving ability. For this purpose, a survey research method was used and the data collected on deep strategies, surface strategies, mastery goals, performance- approach goals, performance-avoidance goals and family socioeconomic status by using the Goal Achievement Questionnaire proposed by Elliot and Church and Study Process Questionnaire by Biggs. A sample of 427 students were selected through random cluster sampling. The results showed that the relation ship mastery goals and learning deep strategy and mathematical problem solving ability was positive and significant but the relation ship between performance-approach goals and performance-avoidance goals with mathematical problem solving ability was not significant. The relationship between deep strategy and mathematical problem solving ability was positive and significant and the relationship between surface strategy and mathematic problem solving ability was negative but not significant. The results also showed that mastery goals are the most important factor affecting the mathematical problem solving ability and boys used performance-approach goals more than girls and the students belonging to low socioeconomic status used mastery goals more than of high socioeconomic status. Yet, there is no difference between those students, learning strategy and mathematical problem solving ability in terms of gender and family socioeconomic status.