Medical measures often have beneficial results for patients, but in some cases, it leads to patient's loss or death, although the physician does much effort and makes no faults.However, most of Imamieh jurists believe in physician’s civil responsibility in this case. Some jurists consider it with no civil responsibility according to beneficence rule, and it needs much thought on this rule with attention to these two different ideas.This article aims to study beneficence rule in physician's civil responsibility according to different viewpoints of jurists and the obstacles of this rule execution. It is concluded that there is no general command for physician's beneficence, since it is based on common law. So, the physician's behavior toward patients and the intention may be considered beneficent or may not in different situations.There is no civil responsibility in all cases that the physician is known beneficent, since civil responsibility and beneficence cannot be (gathered) together and Ehsan Verse's language and style is common for this case.