This paper is to compare the thinking styles and excitement of art and mathematics students to promote organizational positive behaviors. This research is non-experimental and Ex Post Facto. The target population of the study was comprised of all the undergraduate students studying art and mathematics at The Faculty of Art and Architecture as well as The Faculty of Sciences at Payambar-e-Azam Educational Complex of Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch. The final sample contains 928 students - 266 males and 662 females-selected via stratified sampling. To measure the thinking styles and excitement of the participants, Sternberg’s Thinking Style Inventory (Sternberg, 1997) and The Arnett inventory of sensation (Arnett, 1994) were administered respectively. After collecting the data, the hypothesis of the study were tested by using independent samples, T-test and SPSS. The findings represented that there is no significant difference between the art and math groups in terms of the males’ thinking styles, and there is no significant difference between the art and math groups in terms of the females’ scores on judicial, monarchic, and hierarchic thinking styles. Moreover, the math group is of a significantly higher mean score on the executive thinking style than the art group, and the art group is of a higher mean score on the legislative, oligarchic, and anarchic thinking styles compared to the math group. Finally, both male and female students in the art group are of higher mean scores on the excitement than the male and female students in the math group, respectively. This study concludes that it is necessary for the organizations to pay more attention to organizational positive behaviors such as legislative thinking style and those which contribute to this thinking style and creativity. Furthermore, organizations should attempt to increase individual’s positive emotions to improve their performance in work environment.