This research investigated how resiliency, positive and negative effects relate to self efficacy and job satisfactions. In particular how many dimensions are necessary to understand the association between the two sets of variables? The sample embraced 222 of Ahvaz Municipal Administration Employees who were selected randomly via simple sampling procedure based on Morgan table. Conner and Davidson Resiliency Scale (CD-RISC), Positive and Negative Effect Scales, General Self Efficacy Scale and Job Description Index (JDI) were administrated as data sources. Tests of dimensionality for the canonical correlation analysis indicated that just one of the three canonical dimensions was statistically significant at the0.05 level. Dimension 1 had a canonical correlation of 0.70 between the sets of variables, while for dimension 2 and 3 the canonical correlation were much lower at 0.16 and 0.10 respectively. The results also revealed that; according to the standardized canonical coefficients for the first dimensions across both sets of variables; for the variables resiliency, positive and negative effects, the first canonical dimension is most strongly influenced by resiliency (-0.79), then negative effects (0.28) and positive effects (-0.12) with less influential. For the self efficacy and job satisfactions variables, the first dimension was comprised of self efficacy (-0.94) promotion satisfaction (-0.17) and career satisfaction (-0.12). Additionally, the analysis suggested that, although the financial component was a factor in job satisfaction, it was not as important as the other satisfaction-related variables. For the second and third dimensions dominating variables were not identified due to lack of significance.