Introduction: The present study deals with analyzing and explaining electoral preferences based on the analysis of occupation classes. To date, electoral preferences in Iran has not been analyzed experimentally. Despite a few studies after the Islamic Revolution on social classes in Iran, these inquiries have been overlooked due to a variety of reasons (Haji Yousefi, Farazi, & Keyvan Ara, 2012). Certain researchers in Iran have challenged the efficiency of class analysis using Skase’ s (2001) idea that class is no longer a valid descriptive or analytic tool and as class has been deteriorating as a means for analysis, the existential cause behind academic sociology has been declining as well (Ghaderi & Kaveh, 2015)). On the other hand, some have emphasized analysis based on class as they associate Khatami’ s victory in the Seventh Iranian Presidential election to the middle class (Saei, 2007; Bashiriyeh, 2008; Ghouchani, 2000; Bohrani, 2010; Seifzadeh and Golpayegani, 2009; Zibakalam et al., 2009); It is also believed that Ahmadinezhad’ s victory has been the result of the middle class’ s passivity and progress of the underprivileged class (Qasemi Siyani, Ravash, & Mahmoudi Raja, 2016). Examination into the background of the study suggest the higher emphasis placed on the middle class along with the exploration of political behavior in this group. Given such a background, there exists a significant conflict in these studies due to the difference of this class’ s behavior in the seventh (1997), tenth (2005), and eleventh (2009) presidential elections. Given the absence of a comprehensive work with respect to the political behavior of classes in Iran and the paradoxical results obtained from examining the political behavior of the middle class, this study seeks to examine the orientation and preferences of classes in presidential elections...