Iranian state cinema shows how the Islamic Republic deals with the medium of cinema, of which from the very beginning, the leaders of the revolution, emphasizing its importance, promised to “ change its form” in the Islamic government and demanded the intervention and monitoring of the government. By establishment of the Farabi Cinema Foundation in 1983, that demand was realized, and since then, the cinema that the government wished to promote and distribute has gradually found its formation through applying the policies, guidelines, and supporting of the Farabi Foundation. Four decades have passed since the establishment of the Farabi Cinema Foundation, during which its directors and managers, each based on the political culture of the government from which they were allowed to operate, as well as their own values and beliefs, have been the agents and implementers of cinematic policies. In this study, we tried to identify and analyze the policies of Farabi Cinema Foundation, the type of cinema they recommend and support, as well as their policymakers and managers views in five post-revolutionary States, in historical institutionalism and “ narrative analysis” approach, in three parts of “ production, releasing, and the Fajr Film Festival. The findings of this study showed that the policymakers and directors of the Farabi Cinema Foundation have been thinking of producing Iranian films and creating National Cinema since its establishment, but each with a specific and different perception of the medium of cinema, the concept of national cinema, and the audience. Therefore, they attempt to create a special order in the production and distribution of films in Iran. According to this study, Iranian cinema policymakers do not have the same understanding of what kind of cinema Iranian people and society deserve to have and promote. They also do not agree with their critics on a common definition of culture, value, people, national cinema, and national interests, so they are constantly arguing with each other to prove their legitimacy, and each witness the “ people” to prove the correctness of their policies.