مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

228
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Reflections on Fasting in Jurisprudence,A Criminal Act or a Forbidden Act?

Pages

  537-552

Abstract

 One of the basic principles in criminal law is the principle of legality of crimes and punishments. Crimes, punishments and their qualities under the above principle must be foreseen. Different legislatures have incorporated this principle into either criminal law, constitutions, or our rights. In the present study, with a descriptive-analytical method and using library sources, we investigate the case of Fasting or not in the scope of the mentioned principle. The religion of Islam, by bringing the rule of ugliness of the eagle of Balabian, has confirmed the principle of legality of crimes and punishments, and judges should consider such a principle in their rulings, and behavior that is not considered a crime in the law can not be ruled and interpreted. Judges must also be within the framework of the principle, and behavior such as Fasting in public, although morally ugly, but until explicitly criminalized in the law, can not be interpreted by Article 638 of the Islamic Penal Code approved in 1996, which is made of words and phrases Vague took advantage of such behavior and criminalized it. Because human actions and omissions, no matter how reprehensible and harmful to the social system, are not punishable as long as there is no provision for it in the law. In other words, human actions are permissible as long as the legislator does not criminalize the act or omission of the act and does not prescribe a punishment for it.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Mousavi Azadeh, Sayyed Reza, Esfandiar, Iman, & Razavi, Sayyed Hamed. (2022). Reflections on Fasting in Jurisprudence,A Criminal Act or a Forbidden Act?. LEGAL CIVIZILATION, 5(11 ), 537-552. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1017416/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Mousavi Azadeh Sayyed Reza, Esfandiar Iman, Razavi Sayyed Hamed. Reflections on Fasting in Jurisprudence,A Criminal Act or a Forbidden Act?. LEGAL CIVIZILATION[Internet]. 2022;5(11 ):537-552. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/1017416/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Sayyed Reza Mousavi Azadeh, Iman Esfandiar, and Sayyed Hamed Razavi, “Reflections on Fasting in Jurisprudence,A Criminal Act or a Forbidden Act?,” LEGAL CIVIZILATION, vol. 5, no. 11 , pp. 537–552, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/1017416/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button