Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,158
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ASSESSING THE PHYSICIANS' ORDER ERRORS IN MEDICAL RECORDS AND IT'S EFFECTIVE FACTORS (A CASE STUDY)

Pages

  41-48

Abstract

 Background: Nowadays, Patient Safety is considered as a fundamental concept of the healthcare system. Hence, recognizing the effective factors such as illegible orders, dosage errors, and drug usage can reduce serious side effects leading to the patients' disability, prolonged hospitalization and even death.Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study performed as a cross-sectional one. 1800 INPATIENT records selected in a teaching hospital during one year. The physician first order was examined through a self-adminstrated checklist including physicians’ ID and workshifts, and variables like legibility and recorded dosage. Data analysis conducted via SPSS using descriptive statistics and analytical statistics tests.Results: Among 1800 studied records, there were 66.3% recorded by male, 17.6% illegible, 3.2% with no stamp, 8.2% without signing, 11.9% without time and 4.9% with no date.23% of physician records didn't have coherence and logical sequence, 69.5% did not indicate to the primary items, 17.8% with no medicine dosage, 21.8% without pharmaceutical forms, 11.5% with no usage time, 25.9% without usage method, 14.3% had scribbles and 13% were devoid of numbering. Also, there were a significant relation between demographic variables and some MEDICAL RECORDing errors.Conclusion: it is necessary to endeavor physicians in patient records documentation improvement and can be used some strategies such as educating the newly arrived residents, considering commendatory techniques and record periodic evaluation.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    AZIMI, L., MARKAZI MOGHADDAM, N., ROSTAMI, KH., TALEBI, A., ESKANDARIKIA, A., MIRZAIY, A., & AZIMI, M.E.. (2016). ASSESSING THE PHYSICIANS' ORDER ERRORS IN MEDICAL RECORDS AND IT'S EFFECTIVE FACTORS (A CASE STUDY). HOSPITAL, 15(2 (57)), 41-48. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/106623/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AZIMI L., MARKAZI MOGHADDAM N., ROSTAMI KH., TALEBI A., ESKANDARIKIA A., MIRZAIY A., AZIMI M.E.. ASSESSING THE PHYSICIANS' ORDER ERRORS IN MEDICAL RECORDS AND IT'S EFFECTIVE FACTORS (A CASE STUDY). HOSPITAL[Internet]. 2016;15(2 (57)):41-48. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/106623/en

    IEEE: Copy

    L. AZIMI, N. MARKAZI MOGHADDAM, KH. ROSTAMI, A. TALEBI, A. ESKANDARIKIA, A. MIRZAIY, and M.E. AZIMI, “ASSESSING THE PHYSICIANS' ORDER ERRORS IN MEDICAL RECORDS AND IT'S EFFECTIVE FACTORS (A CASE STUDY),” HOSPITAL, vol. 15, no. 2 (57), pp. 41–48, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/106623/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top