مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,460
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SAFETY AND DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF DUAL-SOURCE CT SCAN IN COMPARISON WITH SINGLE SOURCE CT SCAN AND CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY IN CORONARY HEART DISEASES

Pages

  25-32

Keywords

Abstract

 Background: The aim of this study is to explore the safety and diagnostic performance of DUAL-SOURCE CT SCAN in comparison with single source CT SCAN and conventional angiography in patients with coronary heart diseases.Materials and methods: A systematic review was performed using CRD standard methods. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and TRIP were searched up to April 2009. The references of the marked studies and gray literature were also searched.Results: 17 articles were included. 9 articles reported the safety and 12 articles reported the diagnostic performance of DSCT.  Generally DSCT was a non-invasive and safe procedure.  Using DSCT the exposure of patient to X-ray was less than 64-slice single source CT (SSCT) and more than conventional angiography. For the DSCT the mean sensitivity was 90.4%, mean specificity was 82%, mean PPV was 83% and mean NPV was 96%. For the SSCT the mean sensitivity was 90.4%, mean specificity was 82%, mean PPV was 83% and mean NPV was 96%. The mean sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of DSCT were slightly higher than SSCT.Conclusion: DSCT is a noninvasive and relatively safe technology. The diagnostic performance of DSCT is higher than SSCT, but its performance is not so much high to be able to substitute the conventional invasive angiography which is still the gold standard test.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOKHTARI PAYAM, M., SARI, A.A., AY, M.R., MOBINIZADEH, M.R., & MAANAVI, S.. (2010). SAFETY AND DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF DUAL-SOURCE CT SCAN IN COMPARISON WITH SINGLE SOURCE CT SCAN AND CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY IN CORONARY HEART DISEASES. HOSPITAL, 9(1-2 (34)), 25-32. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/106715/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOKHTARI PAYAM M., SARI A.A., AY M.R., MOBINIZADEH M.R., MAANAVI S.. SAFETY AND DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF DUAL-SOURCE CT SCAN IN COMPARISON WITH SINGLE SOURCE CT SCAN AND CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY IN CORONARY HEART DISEASES. HOSPITAL[Internet]. 2010;9(1-2 (34)):25-32. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/106715/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. MOKHTARI PAYAM, A.A. SARI, M.R. AY, M.R. MOBINIZADEH, and S. MAANAVI, “SAFETY AND DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF DUAL-SOURCE CT SCAN IN COMPARISON WITH SINGLE SOURCE CT SCAN AND CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY IN CORONARY HEART DISEASES,” HOSPITAL, vol. 9, no. 1-2 (34), pp. 25–32, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/106715/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button