BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES: A CRITIQUE ON MS THESES IN SHAHEED BEHESHTI FACULTY OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DARVISHPOUR KAKHAKI A.; YAGHMAEI FARIDEH; MOZAFARI MOSAYEB

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Advances in Nursing and Midwifery Year:2007 | Volume:16 | Issue:58 Page(s): 50-55

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,483

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES: A CRITIQUE ON MS THESES IN SHAHEED BEHESHTI FACULTY OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY

Author(s)

DARVISHPOUR KAKHAKI A. | YAGHMAEI FARIDEH | MOZAFARI MOSAYEB | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURESQ4

NURSING THESISQ4

MIDWIFERY THESISQ4

Abstract

Background: BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES are the most common instruments for collecting data in medical science studies. To collect valid and reliable data, it is critical to apply these measures appropriately. Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess and critique the validity and reliability of BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES in MS theses in Shaheed Beheshti Faculty of nursing and midwifery. Methods: 343 nursing and 166 midwifery theses were first assessed to identify those with BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES and in 48 ones with these measures, methods used for identifying their validity and reliability were checked. Results: Findings showed that scientific methods for examining accuracy, selectivity, precision, sensitivity and calibration of BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES were not accurately applied.Conclusion: This study reveals inadequate application of scientific methods regarding to accuracy and precision of BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES. Accordingly, better methods for identifying accuracy and precision of BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES should be applied.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

DARVISHPOUR KAKHAKI, A., YAGHMAEI, FARIDEH, & MOZAFARI, MOSAYEB. (2007). BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES: A CRITIQUE ON MS THESES IN SHAHEED BEHESHTI FACULTY OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY. ADVANCES IN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY (FACULTY OF NURSING OF MIDWIFERY QUARTERLY), 16(58), 50-55. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/108318/en

Vancouver: Copy

DARVISHPOUR KAKHAKI A., YAGHMAEI FARIDEH, MOZAFARI MOSAYEB. BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES: A CRITIQUE ON MS THESES IN SHAHEED BEHESHTI FACULTY OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY. ADVANCES IN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY (FACULTY OF NURSING OF MIDWIFERY QUARTERLY)[Internet]. 2007;16(58):50-55. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/108318/en

IEEE: Copy

A. DARVISHPOUR KAKHAKI, FARIDEH YAGHMAEI, and MOSAYEB MOZAFARI, “BIOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES: A CRITIQUE ON MS THESES IN SHAHEED BEHESHTI FACULTY OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY,” ADVANCES IN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY (FACULTY OF NURSING OF MIDWIFERY QUARTERLY), vol. 16, no. 58, pp. 50–55, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/108318/en

Related Journal Papers