Persian Causality Corpus (PerCause) and the Causality Detection Benchmark

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Rahimi Zeinab; ShamsFard Mehrnoush

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management Year:2023 | Volume:38 | Issue:2 Page(s): 273-303

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Persian Causality Corpus (PerCause) and the Causality Detection Benchmark

Author(s)

Rahimi Zeinab | ShamsFard Mehrnoush | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PerCauseQ4

Causality annotated corpusQ4

causality detectionQ4

Deep LearningQ4

CRFQ4

Abstract

Recognizing causal elements and causal relations in the text is among the challenging issues in natural language processing (NLP), specifically in low-resource languages such as Persian. In this research, we prepare a causality human-annotated corpus for the Persian language. This corpus consists of 4446 sentences and 5128 causal relations. Three labels of Cause, Effect, and Causal mark are specified to each relation, if possible. We used this corpus to train a system for detecting causal elements’ boundaries. Also, we present a causality detection benchmark for three machine-learning methods and two Deep Learning systems based on this corpus. Performance evaluations indicate that our best total result is obtained through the CRF classifier, which provides an F-measure of 0. 76. In addition, the best accuracy (91. 4%) is obtained through the BiLSTM-CRF Deep Learning method

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops