HABERMAS DIALOGIC DEMOCRACY: RELATION FACTORS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ALEM ABD AL RAHMAN; POURPASHA KASIN ALI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Political Quarterly Year:2011 | Volume:41 | Issue:1 Page(s): 153-170

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,699

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

HABERMAS DIALOGIC DEMOCRACY: RELATION FACTORS

Author(s)

ALEM ABD AL RAHMAN | POURPASHA KASIN ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DIALOGIC DEMOCRACYQ3

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGEQ2

LINGUISTIC RELATIVITYQ2

LANGUAGE PLAYSQ2

Abstract

Modernity has been interpreted from different angles. Scholars such as Derida and Lyotard talk about the end of modernity and the beginning of a new era called post-modernism, though thinkers like Habermas do not believe in that.Habermas who do not believe in the end of modernity and the beginning of post-modernism, finds modernism as the only way to human liberty who has chosen a wrong path and asserts that its superficial face should be reconstructed. In the search to find a solution for this situation, Habermas proposes two matters: “dialog in the public domain” and “DIALOGIC DEMOCRACY theory”. His theory has attracted criticisms which are of considerable importance in political thinking domain. Lyotard criticized Habermas’s “DIALOGIC DEMOCRACY theory”, particularly the concept of oriented integration in this theory. The purpose of the present article is to criticize Habermas’s theory. We made use of analytical research method since the aim of our research was to analyze and probe into Habermas’s theory, our criticism on that with regard to the original text and its interpreters. Therefore this research is to clarify two important concerns: first to distinguish the kind of school in which these scholars fit, say, modernism or post- modernism and second their different perspectives toward issues of “language’ and “linguistic turning’.In fact Habermas uses communicative and dialogic language, while Lyotard make use of ‘language plays” and “linguistic relativity”. Ultimately Lyotard’s criticism of Habermas’s theory is based on this “linguistic relativity”.The final purpose of the present research is to analyze Habermas‘s DIALOGIC DEMOCRACY theory in a comprehensive way and to show its unique position in Habermas‘s liberal thinking.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

ALEM, ABD AL RAHMAN, & POURPASHA KASIN, ALI. (2011). HABERMAS DIALOGIC DEMOCRACY: RELATION FACTORS. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 41(1), 153-170. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/110362/en

Vancouver: Copy

ALEM ABD AL RAHMAN, POURPASHA KASIN ALI. HABERMAS DIALOGIC DEMOCRACY: RELATION FACTORS. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2011;41(1):153-170. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/110362/en

IEEE: Copy

ABD AL RAHMAN ALEM, and ALI POURPASHA KASIN, “HABERMAS DIALOGIC DEMOCRACY: RELATION FACTORS,” POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 153–170, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/110362/en

Related Journal Papers