Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage between MTA and CEM in Furcal Perforation Seal in Primary Peeth

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHARIFI M.; KhoramianTusi s.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY Year:2017 | Volume:12 | Issue:2 Page(s): 25-40

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

652

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage between MTA and CEM in Furcal Perforation Seal in Primary Peeth

Author(s)

SHARIFI M. | KhoramianTusi s. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MTAQ2

CEMQ2

bacterial penetration methodQ2

Abstract

Background and aims: Sealing the furcal perforation is an important factor to reduce inflammation and perform healing. Selecting the appropriate material to repair the defect is an important concern. Among the various available materials, MTA and CEM showed better properties to achieve this purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of these materials by bacterial penetration method in furcal perforation repair of primary molars. Materials and Method: Sixty five primary molars were selected for this in vitro study. The teeth were divided in to three groups including two experimental group (n=30) and one control group (n=5). Five teeth which were existed in control group, randomly divided in to three negative control teeth and two positive control teeth. The perforation defects at the size of 3×4 mm2 were prepared on the furcation of two experimental group and two samples of positive control group. In group 1 the perforations were sealed with MTA and in group 2 the perforations were sealed with CEM. Then samples were undergone bacterial penetration test. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with Log-rank test between two experimental groups. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between MTA and CEM in bacterial penetration as a reparative material for furcal perforation repairs (p=0. 204). Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, MTA and CEM have an equal sealing ability by using bacterial penetration method.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHARIFI, M., & KhoramianTusi, s.. (2017). Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage between MTA and CEM in Furcal Perforation Seal in Primary Peeth. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 12(2 ), 25-40. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/112648/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHARIFI M., KhoramianTusi s.. Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage between MTA and CEM in Furcal Perforation Seal in Primary Peeth. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY[Internet]. 2017;12(2 ):25-40. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/112648/en

IEEE: Copy

M. SHARIFI, and s. KhoramianTusi, “Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage between MTA and CEM in Furcal Perforation Seal in Primary Peeth,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, vol. 12, no. 2 , pp. 25–40, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/112648/en

Related Journal Papers