مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

44,617
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EFFICACY OF DRAIN PLACEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Pages

  73-78

Abstract

 Introduction & Objective: LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY is the safe and gold standard treatment in most patients with gallbladder diseases worldwide. Routine DRAIN placement after LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY is controversy and most surgeons use it to prevent collection of blood, bile or pus. But DRAINs can cause pain, infection, more prominent scar and delay in discharge of patients. This study assessed DRAIN EFFICACY in LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY by assessment of volume and contents of DRAINed fluid, and its advantages and disadvantages.Materials & Methods: This study was performed on 92 patients in Dr. Shariati hospital during 2007-8 underwent urgent or elective LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. Demographic characteristics of patients, indication of surgery, duration of surgery and postoperative pain and events were collected. Value and content of DRAINed fluid, and postoperative hospital stay were recorded and analyzed.Results: DRAINs were fixed in 59 (64.1%) patients and 33 (35.9%) patients did not have DRAIN. Mean DRAINed fluid was 40.4±28.4 milliliters (range: 10-300 cc). Fluid was serous or serosanguineous in all cases, no fresh blood or bile in any case. In most cases (90%) fluid volume was less than 100 cc. None of the patients without DRAINs suffered abdominal collection, percutaneous DRAINage or repeated surgery. Pain was more in patients with DRAINs. Using visual analogue score (0-10), pain was scored 1.5±1.2 in patient without DRAIN and 2.2±1 in patients with DRAIN, 12 hours after surgery (P-value=0.018). Mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.3±0.5 days in patients without DRAIN and 1.8±0.6 days in the other group ((P-value<0.0001).Conclusions: It seems that DRAINs in LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY evacuate little insignificant fluid. DRAIN placement can cause more pain, longer admission period and more cost. It is recommended not to place DRAINs were not necessary cases. Reducing use of DRAINs through correct clinical judgment can decreases its disadvantages such as pain, infection, patient anxiety, longer admission period and costs.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KHOURGAMI, ZH., MASOUMI, HOSSEIN, SOROUSH, A.R., GHAFOURI, ALI, & NADERI, NASIM. (2008). EFFICACY OF DRAIN PLACEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 16(2), 73-78. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/112967/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KHOURGAMI ZH., MASOUMI HOSSEIN, SOROUSH A.R., GHAFOURI ALI, NADERI NASIM. EFFICACY OF DRAIN PLACEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY[Internet]. 2008;16(2):73-78. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/112967/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ZH. KHOURGAMI, HOSSEIN MASOUMI, A.R. SOROUSH, ALI GHAFOURI, and NASIM NADERI, “EFFICACY OF DRAIN PLACEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 73–78, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/112967/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top