مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

مقاله مقاله نشریه

مشخصات مقاله

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

نسخه انگلیسی
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

نسخه انگلیسی

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

بازدید:

44
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

دانلود:

14
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

استناد:

اطلاعات مقاله نشریه

عنوان

The Deficits of Scientific Scepticism: Revisiting the Higher Values of Contextualistic Pluralism in Justification of Truth and Knowledge Claims

نویسندگان

 Etuk Anthony | صدور گواهی نویسنده 

صفحات

 صفحه شروع 116 | صفحه پایان 127

چکیده

 scientific scepticism, fundamentally, questions the veracity and epistemic value of claims not supported by scientific evidence. Motivated by the assumption that only the Empirical investigation of reality leads to the truth, the scientific sceptics often maintain that only scientific method is best suited for this purpose. Claims found to be wanting in scientific evidence are considered untrue, and of little or no epistemic consequence. Using the analytical and critical methods, this paper interrogates this epistemic criterion of justification of scientific scepticism. It shows the inherent epistemic deficits in this criterion of the scientific sceptics, and how absolutizing its demands in such a manner as to undermine the veracity and epistemic significance of claims outside the mainstream discipline of science is not only to entrap themselves in many epistemic burdens, but also to sink under the unsavoury weight of criteriological egocentrism, detrimental to cognitive progress. As a credible alternative, this paper explores the epistemic fecundity of contextualistic pluralism – the pluralism of contextually underwritten cognitive positions – in truth and knowledge justification. It concludes with the relevance of this approach in epistemic justification as evident in its inclusive nature as well as its shift of the focus of philosophical thinking from identity to diversity in an interculturality society.

استنادها

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • ارجاعات

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • استناددهی

    مقالات مرتبط نشریه ای

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • مقالات مرتبط همایشی

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • طرح های مرتبط

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • کارگاه های پیشنهادی






    بازگشت به بالا
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button