STUDENTS’ EVALUATION METHODS BY ACADEMIC STAFF IN SHAHREKORD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DELARAM M.; FOROUZANDEH N.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Strides in Development of Medical Education Journal Year:2010 | Volume:7 | Issue:1 Page(s): 51-56

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

807

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

STUDENTS’ EVALUATION METHODS BY ACADEMIC STAFF IN SHAHREKORD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Author(s)

DELARAM M. | FOROUZANDEH N. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

METHODS OF EVALUATIONQ3

STUDENTSQ2

INSTRUCTORSQ3

Abstract

Background & Objective: Effective evaluation is one the most important basic issues of educational processes and not only to diverse the STUDENTS, but also helps the instructor in his activities. Purpose: The aim of this study was to detect the METHODS OF EVALUATION by INSTRUCTORS in Shahrekord University of medical sciences.Methods: In this descriptive study, 122 instructor answered to a questionnaire. The validity of questionnaire was detected by the experts, viewpoints and its relibility was determined by alph chronbakh (0.79). Data was analyzed by spss and p<0.05 was concidered significant.Results: 69.4% of INSTRUCTORS used final and continuous evaluation and 16.2% used only final evaluation .Explanatory and multi-choice questions were the most common questions in examinations .88.3% Of INSTRUCTORS believed that the final examination is the most important criteria in their evaluation and 38.2% used mid-term examination.Conclusion: Final and continuous evaluations were the most methods in evaluation. Most of questions were explanatory and multiple-choice and were selected before examination and not during the designing of course plan. mid-term examination and selection of questions during the designing of course plan writing is suggested.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

DELARAM, M., & FOROUZANDEH, N.. (2010). STUDENTS’ EVALUATION METHODS BY ACADEMIC STAFF IN SHAHREKORD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 7(1), 51-56. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/116772/en

Vancouver: Copy

DELARAM M., FOROUZANDEH N.. STUDENTS’ EVALUATION METHODS BY ACADEMIC STAFF IN SHAHREKORD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2010;7(1):51-56. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/116772/en

IEEE: Copy

M. DELARAM, and N. FOROUZANDEH, “STUDENTS’ EVALUATION METHODS BY ACADEMIC STAFF IN SHAHREKORD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,” STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/116772/en

Related Journal Papers