METAEVALUATION AND ITS STANDARDS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SABZEVARI S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Strides in Development of Medical Education Journal Year:2006 | Volume:2 | Issue:2 Page(s): 116-124

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

3,318

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

METAEVALUATION AND ITS STANDARDS

Author(s)

SABZEVARI S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EVALUATIONQ3

METAEVALUATIONQ4

EVALUATION STANDARDSQ4

Abstract

Background: MetaEVALUATION is a process that design, collect and use information for judging about EVALUATION and generally determine weak and strong. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational EVALUATION believed that quality of EVALUATION is depended on utility, feasibility, propriety and accuracy. A utility standard means that EVALUATION meets informational needs for users. Feasibility standards are intended to ensure that an EVALUATION will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal. Propriety standards are for doing EVALUATION at legal and ethical manner with considering welfare of those involved in EVALUATION and as well as those affected by its results.Finally, accuracy standards collect adequate information about the features that determine worth or merit of the program being evaluated.Conclusion: MetaEVALUATION try to find a proper method for doing EVALUATIONs. It can include program, student, project, product, system, institute, theory, personnel, EVALUATION.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SABZEVARI, S.. (2006). METAEVALUATION AND ITS STANDARDS. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2(2), 116-124. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/116973/en

Vancouver: Copy

SABZEVARI S.. METAEVALUATION AND ITS STANDARDS. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2006;2(2):116-124. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/116973/en

IEEE: Copy

S. SABZEVARI, “METAEVALUATION AND ITS STANDARDS,” STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 116–124, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/116973/en

Related Journal Papers