مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

960
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

TRENDS IN NESTED CASE- CONTROL STUDIES AS COMPARED TO CASE- CONTROL AND COHORT DESIGNS, 1996- 2005

Pages

  1-5

Abstract

 Background & Objectives: This investigation was prompted by the growing importance of nested case-control studies and the increasing frequency with which they are done in epidemiologic research. After a brief explanation of nested case-control studies, we evaluate the trends in research methodology over the last decade, especially with regard to cohort, case-control, and nested case-control designs.Methods: Data for this study were extracted from the PubMed database, using these keywords: Nested Case- Control, Risk-Set Sampling and Density Sampling. The search was confined to the 10-year period from 1996 to the end of 2005. As for other methodologies, we used keywords Cohort and Case-Control for a search over the same time period. The search itself was performed on April 25, 2006.Results: We found 2011 articles reporting nested case-control studies. There were 95 such articles in 1996; the number had increased to 289 in 2005. Case-control and cohort designs accounted for 68456 and 60479 articles, respectively. The number of case-control articles rose from 4378 in 1996 to 10270 in 2005, while that of cohort articles increased from 2981 to 9771 over the same period.Conclusions: The number of cohort and nested case-control articles followed similar upward trends over the last decade and their rate of increase was greater than that of simple case-control articles.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    CHAMAN, R., SHAMSHIRI, A., KAMALI, K., KHALILI, GH.R., & HOLAKOUEI NAEINI, KOUROSH. (2006). TRENDS IN NESTED CASE- CONTROL STUDIES AS COMPARED TO CASE- CONTROL AND COHORT DESIGNS, 1996- 2005. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1(3), 1-5. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/120594/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    CHAMAN R., SHAMSHIRI A., KAMALI K., KHALILI GH.R., HOLAKOUEI NAEINI KOUROSH. TRENDS IN NESTED CASE- CONTROL STUDIES AS COMPARED TO CASE- CONTROL AND COHORT DESIGNS, 1996- 2005. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY[Internet]. 2006;1(3):1-5. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/120594/en

    IEEE: Copy

    R. CHAMAN, A. SHAMSHIRI, K. KAMALI, GH.R. KHALILI, and KOUROSH HOLAKOUEI NAEINI, “TRENDS IN NESTED CASE- CONTROL STUDIES AS COMPARED TO CASE- CONTROL AND COHORT DESIGNS, 1996- 2005,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–5, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/120594/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button