Translation and Survey of Validity and Reliability of Routine Information Systems Management Tools in Iran

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ROUHANI SAMAD; Safizade Khadije; MOUSAVINASAB SEYEDNOURADDIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Health Information Management Year:2018 | Volume:15 | Issue:4 (62) Page(s): 168-174

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

837

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Translation and Survey of Validity and Reliability of Routine Information Systems Management Tools in Iran

Author(s)

ROUHANI SAMAD | Safizade Khadije | MOUSAVINASAB SEYEDNOURADDIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Qualitative EvaluationQ1

Data QualityQ1

Health Care SystemsQ1

Abstract

Introduction: Qualitative information is necessary for planning, decision-making, and performance management. Scales for assessing the Performance of Routine Information Systems Management (PRISM) have international applications as tools for Data Quality assessment. So, the aim of this study was to survey the validity and reliability of these scales in the context of Iran. Methods: This was a descriptive study. In order to determine the validity and reliability of these scales, first, they were translated to Persian. Then, an expert panel with 20 members was used to determine the validity of the scales. In order to determine the reliability, the tools were used in 50 primary health care centers in Mazandaran Province, and the Kuder-Richardson and Cronbach’ s alpha reliability coefficients were used as well. Results: The expert panel confirmed the content validity of the scales. These experts, while maintaining the original structure and dimensions of the tools, modified them by making some changes including eliminating, adding, and/or modifying some items. The reliability coefficients of these scales for Kuder-Richardson and Cronbach’ s alpha were estimated to be 0. 72 and 0. 77, respectively. Conclusion: Translated PRISM scales are appropriate instruments for assessing the performance of health information systems, as well as quality assessment of routine health system data in Iran.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ROUHANI, SAMAD, Safizade, Khadije, & MOUSAVINASAB, SEYEDNOURADDIN. (2018). Translation and Survey of Validity and Reliability of Routine Information Systems Management Tools in Iran. HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 15(4 (62) ), 168-174. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/121824/en

Vancouver: Copy

ROUHANI SAMAD, Safizade Khadije, MOUSAVINASAB SEYEDNOURADDIN. Translation and Survey of Validity and Reliability of Routine Information Systems Management Tools in Iran. HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2018;15(4 (62) ):168-174. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/121824/en

IEEE: Copy

SAMAD ROUHANI, Khadije Safizade, and SEYEDNOURADDIN MOUSAVINASAB, “Translation and Survey of Validity and Reliability of Routine Information Systems Management Tools in Iran,” HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, vol. 15, no. 4 (62) , pp. 168–174, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/121824/en

Related Journal Papers