A Study of Beall and Restall's Logical Pluralism

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KALANTARI SEYED ALI; KARBASIZADEH AMIR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Wisdom and Philosophy Year:2019 | Volume:15 | Issue:2 (58) Page(s): 7-28

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

458

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Study of Beall and Restall's Logical Pluralism

Author(s)

KALANTARI SEYED ALI | KARBASIZADEH AMIR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Logical PluralismQ1

BeallQ1

RestallQ1

normativityQ1

CaseQ1

collapseQ1

Abstract

In this paper we will consider the idea of Logical Pluralism with emphasis on Beall and Restall's (2006) account of pluralism. We begin by specification of logical exclusivism, logical relativism and different accounts of Logical Pluralism and their difference with Beall and Restall's account of Logical Pluralism. We show that Beall and Restall believe in a kind of semantic Logical Pluralism according to which there are different plausible interpretations of the "Case" in Traski's definition of validity. On the other hand, they also believe the so-called idea of normativity of logic. According to the idea, the notion of logical validity has normative implications for evaluation of arguments in natural language. Our key claim is that the latter claim undermines Beall and Restall's Logical Pluralism, that is, the normativity of logic collapses their Logical Pluralism into logical exclusivism. The study of different formulations of the normativity of logic is less considered on debates relating to Logical Pluralism. Along with considering logical normativity, we will criticize Beall and Restall's pluralism.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KALANTARI, SEYED ALI, & KARBASIZADEH, AMIR. (2019). A Study of Beall and Restall's Logical Pluralism. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 15(2 (58) ), 7-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123417/en

Vancouver: Copy

KALANTARI SEYED ALI, KARBASIZADEH AMIR. A Study of Beall and Restall's Logical Pluralism. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2019;15(2 (58) ):7-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123417/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYED ALI KALANTARI, and AMIR KARBASIZADEH, “A Study of Beall and Restall's Logical Pluralism,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 15, no. 2 (58) , pp. 7–28, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123417/en

Related Journal Papers