Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KARIMZADEH OMID

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Wisdom and Philosophy Year:2019 | Volume:14 | Issue:4 (56) Page(s): 43-59

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

330

Download:

108

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement

Author(s)

KARIMZADEH OMID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Conciliatory ViewQ1

DisagreementQ1

IntuitionQ2

VisionQ1

AsymmetryQ1

Normative judgement.Q1

Abstract

In this paper I propose an argument against the Conciliatory View in peer Disagreement. One of the most important grounds for Conciliatory Views is the assumption that the epistemic situation in peer Disagreement between two peers is symmetri cal. Symmetry justifies the Conciliatory Views. If so, showing that the situation is actually asymmetric should count as a refutation to Conciliatory Views of Disagreement. By appealing to the difference between the processes by which the beliefs of the two parties have been formed, I try to show that there is a difference between the reliabilities of the two beliefs. This means the asymmetrical situation between two peers in Disagreement. Since the conciliatory and steadfast views are contradictory views, any argument against one of them should be considered as an argument for the other.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KARIMZADEH, OMID. (2019). Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 14(4 (56) ), 43-59. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123435/en

Vancouver: Copy

KARIMZADEH OMID. Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2019;14(4 (56) ):43-59. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123435/en

IEEE: Copy

OMID KARIMZADEH, “Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 14, no. 4 (56) , pp. 43–59, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123435/en

Related Journal Papers