A COMPARISON OF A PRIORI SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS AND HUME'S THEORY OF IDEAS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MORADKHANI ALI; PURGHANNAD PEYMAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Wisdom and Philosophy Year:2010 | Volume:6 | Issue:3 (23) Page(s): 95-105

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

762

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF A PRIORI SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS AND HUME'S THEORY OF IDEAS

Author(s)

MORADKHANI ALI | PURGHANNAD PEYMAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

A PRIORI SYNTHETIC STATEMENTSQ3

ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS (MEANINGS)Q3

RELATIONQ2

IMPRESSIONSQ3

CONTIGUITY IN TIME OR PLACEQ3

Abstract

This essay is to find distinctive aspects of A PRIORI SYNTHETIC STATEMENTS, whose judgment depends upon categories of understanding, in comparison to Hume’s discussion of abstraction and meaning. Through logical analysis of statements containing Kant’s Categories, we will demonstrate that the categories of Quality and Quantity, excluding the category of Universality, contain no mental concept unlikely to be experienced; they are therefore merely expressive of logical structures–a fact also acknowledged by empiricists–not as essential conditions for judgment. The categories of Modality, if meaningful, are perceivable only by mind not through experience. As for the conditional judgments, the Category of Causality will be discussed more precisely in this paper. It will be shown that the empiricist approach is incompatible with Kant’s theory in respect to the essence of causal RELATION, but compatible with it concerning the very existence of such RELATION. Here, we are not to deal with the Category of Substance or the Category of Reciprocity, since they are simply irrelevant to our discussions.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MORADKHANI, ALI, & PURGHANNAD, PEYMAN. (2010). A COMPARISON OF A PRIORI SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS AND HUME'S THEORY OF IDEAS. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 6(3 (23)), 95-105. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123448/en

Vancouver: Copy

MORADKHANI ALI, PURGHANNAD PEYMAN. A COMPARISON OF A PRIORI SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS AND HUME'S THEORY OF IDEAS. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2010;6(3 (23)):95-105. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123448/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI MORADKHANI, and PEYMAN PURGHANNAD, “A COMPARISON OF A PRIORI SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS AND HUME'S THEORY OF IDEAS,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 6, no. 3 (23), pp. 95–105, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123448/en

Related Journal Papers