مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,001
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

HEIDEGGER AND GADAMER: TWO APPROACHES TO THE CONCEPT OF TRUTH IN PLATO

Author(s)

 HOSSEYNI TOUSHMANLOUEI SEYYED MASOUD | BEHESHTI SEYYED MOHAMMAD REZA | Issue Writer Certificate 

Pages

  33-62

Abstract

 The 'truth' in Martin HEIDEGGER’s philosophy is a fundamental theme. From the very beginning of his intellectual career, HEIDEGGER attempted to give a more fundamental notion of TRUTH, and during his philosophical activity he took various steps in this regard. However, he never ceased from this basic insight that TRUTH is al̕hqeia (aletheia): the struggle between concealment and disclosure. In addition, HEIDEGGER believes that in PLATO’s philosophy, a transformation has emerged in the essence of TRUTH, so that the TRUTH has become Richtigkeit/ correctness. According to HEIDEGGER’s view, this transformation is the source of "Seinsvergessenheit/ forgetfulness of being" and this is the source of various forms of subjectivism and nihilism in the modern age. In contrary, GADAMER argued that PLATO actually held the fundamental TRUTH of al̕hqeia, and that HEIDEGGER’s view that PLATO’s thought would inevitably lead to the oblivion of being and modern subjectivity is not correct. GADAMER has various strategies to prove his point of view. In this article, we will consider the status of the idea of the good in the theory of Ideas and the notion of dialectic in PLATO’s Seventh Letter, and we will try to illustrate along with GADAMER that there are possibilities in PLATO’s thought that can eradicate him from HEIDEGGER’s critique.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HOSSEYNI TOUSHMANLOUEI, SEYYED MASOUD, & BEHESHTI, SEYYED MOHAMMAD REZA. (2018). HEIDEGGER AND GADAMER: TWO APPROACHES TO THE CONCEPT OF TRUTH IN PLATO. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 14(2 (54) ), 33-62. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123476/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HOSSEYNI TOUSHMANLOUEI SEYYED MASOUD, BEHESHTI SEYYED MOHAMMAD REZA. HEIDEGGER AND GADAMER: TWO APPROACHES TO THE CONCEPT OF TRUTH IN PLATO. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2018;14(2 (54) ):33-62. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123476/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SEYYED MASOUD HOSSEYNI TOUSHMANLOUEI, and SEYYED MOHAMMAD REZA BEHESHTI, “HEIDEGGER AND GADAMER: TWO APPROACHES TO THE CONCEPT OF TRUTH IN PLATO,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 14, no. 2 (54) , pp. 33–62, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123476/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button