مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

894
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITIQUE OF THREE GODELIAN ARGUMENTS IN PHILOSOPHY OF MIND

Pages

  33-47

Abstract

 Some philosophers apply Godel incompleteness theorems to show that modeling the mind by means of a machine is not possible. Arguments based on these theorems are called Gödelian arguments in philosophy of mind. In this article, we want to criticize three GODELIAN ARGUMENTS. These arguments have been presented, respectively, by RUDY RUCKER, JOHN RANDOLPH LUCAS AND ROGER PENROSE. We try to show that: (a) some parts of Rucker’s argument are and some other parts of it are not sound; (b) Lucas' argument is absolutely failed; and (c) some parts of Penrose’s argument are sound and some other parts of it are doubtful.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    ZAREPOUR, MOHAMMAD SALEH, & HODJATI, SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI. (2010). CRITIQUE OF THREE GODELIAN ARGUMENTS IN PHILOSOPHY OF MIND. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 6(1 (21)), 33-47. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123537/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ZAREPOUR MOHAMMAD SALEH, HODJATI SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI. CRITIQUE OF THREE GODELIAN ARGUMENTS IN PHILOSOPHY OF MIND. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2010;6(1 (21)):33-47. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123537/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMAD SALEH ZAREPOUR, and SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI HODJATI, “CRITIQUE OF THREE GODELIAN ARGUMENTS IN PHILOSOPHY OF MIND,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 6, no. 1 (21), pp. 33–47, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123537/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button