A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT AND SOME OF ITS RESULTS IN MULLASADRA’S AND SPINOZA’S PHILOSOPHY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BALANIAN MOHAMMAD REZA

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ayeneh Ma‘refat Year:2007 | Volume:- | Issue:12 Page(s): 1-30

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,315

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT AND SOME OF ITS RESULTS IN MULLASADRA’S AND SPINOZA’S PHILOSOPHY

Author(s)

BALANIAN MOHAMMAD REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

GODQ2

ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTQ2

EXISTENCEQ2

SUBSTANCEQ2

ARGUMENT OF THE FAITHFULQ2

Abstract

Many philosophers are convinced that the shortest and the strongest way of proving the EXISTENCE of GOD is the ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. The specific feature of this kind of argument is the fact that it does not use any mediators such as motion, possibility, occurrence, order, etc. and provide witness to the EXISTENCE of GOD from EXISTENCE itself. This kind of proof has been presented by different philosophers in the west and the east with different words in which all of them have tried to present the most complete forms of expression. Among them, Baroch Spinoza from the Netherlands and Mullasadra from Shiraz (Iran) have provided different expressions of the same argument which in addition to their firmness and consistency, resemble closely in terms of their usefulness in answering adequately to objections, the kind of argument with respect to being a priori or posteriori, the image of GOD drawn by these arguments and their portrayal of the issue of GOD’s EXISTENCE in philosophy.The present paper intends to explain, compare and approximate the ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT in the context of these two philosophers’ ideas relying on their resemblances.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

BALANIAN, MOHAMMAD REZA. (2007). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT AND SOME OF ITS RESULTS IN MULLASADRA’S AND SPINOZA’S PHILOSOPHY. AYENEH MAREFAT, -(12), 1-30. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125246/en

Vancouver: Copy

BALANIAN MOHAMMAD REZA. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT AND SOME OF ITS RESULTS IN MULLASADRA’S AND SPINOZA’S PHILOSOPHY. AYENEH MAREFAT[Internet]. 2007;-(12):1-30. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125246/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD REZA BALANIAN, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT AND SOME OF ITS RESULTS IN MULLASADRA’S AND SPINOZA’S PHILOSOPHY,” AYENEH MAREFAT, vol. -, no. 12, pp. 1–30, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125246/en

Related Journal Papers