EPISTEMOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION ACCORDING TO LATER WITTGENSTEIN’S VIEW FROM FOUNDATIONALISM TO CONTEXTUALISM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAHDAVINEZHAD MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN; ALI ZADEH BOYOUK; MOHAMMADZADEH REZA

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT) Year:2006 | Volume:4 | Issue:7 Page(s): 21-56

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,685

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EPISTEMOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION ACCORDING TO LATER WITTGENSTEIN’S VIEW FROM FOUNDATIONALISM TO CONTEXTUALISM

Author(s)

MAHDAVINEZHAD MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN | ALI ZADEH BOYOUK | MOHAMMADZADEH REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NOWLEDGEQ2

JUSTIFICATIONQ2

FOUNDATIONALISMQ2

BASIC BELIEFQ3

CONTEXTUALISMQ3

SKEPTICISMQ2

ACTIONQ2

DOUBTQ2

CERTAINTYQ2

LANGUAGE GAMEQ2

WITTGENSTEINQ2

Abstract

As the claim of kNOWLEDGE without presenting the sufficient ground or evidence is unjustified, the basis of contemporary epistemology is what the foundation of the system of human kNOWLEDGE is and that from where this system originates and where it ends. According to later WITTGENSTEIN, the description of the word without a number of basic and certain propositions is impossible. Although their CERTAINTY does not mean their correspondence with the fact, it relies upon the attitude of the individuals. What is certain and evident for us is determined by a LANGUAGE GAME in which one partakes. Therefore, the human kNOWLEDGE in itself depends on his ACTIONs and characteristic behavioural patterns. WITTGENSTEIN maintains that JUSTIFICATION and rationality rest invariably on context and engage in social activities and LANGUAGE GAMEs. Since forms of life, world-pictures and world – views are different, there are various ways of rationality.In this article, elucidating the tripartite definition of kNOWLEDGE, we have dealt with the analysis of kNOWLEDGE and its distinctive aspect with CERTAINTY from WITTGENSTEIN’s view. Then, referring to the structure of epistemological foundations in WITTGENSTEIN’s thought, we have mentioned it, why according to him, FOUNDATIONALISM fails to defend the validity of epistemological system and with taking the theory of CONTEXTUALISM, what difference will take place in the foundations of kNOWLEDGE and the quality of the dependence of other sciences on them.Finally, studying the theory of CONTEXTUALISM and elucidating a number of its advantages, we have explained that this theory allows a version of relativism and is not without some kind of skeptical tendencies.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MAHDAVINEZHAD, MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, ALI ZADEH, BOYOUK, & MOHAMMADZADEH, REZA. (2006). EPISTEMOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION ACCORDING TO LATER WITTGENSTEIN’S VIEW FROM FOUNDATIONALISM TO CONTEXTUALISM. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), 4(7), 21-56. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125779/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAHDAVINEZHAD MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, ALI ZADEH BOYOUK, MOHAMMADZADEH REZA. EPISTEMOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION ACCORDING TO LATER WITTGENSTEIN’S VIEW FROM FOUNDATIONALISM TO CONTEXTUALISM. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT)[Internet]. 2006;4(7):21-56. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125779/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN MAHDAVINEZHAD, BOYOUK ALI ZADEH, and REZA MOHAMMADZADEH, “EPISTEMOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION ACCORDING TO LATER WITTGENSTEIN’S VIEW FROM FOUNDATIONALISM TO CONTEXTUALISM,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 21–56, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125779/en

Related Journal Papers