ASHTIANI’S OBJECTIONS TO MUDARRES’S THEORY OF “BODILY RESURRECTION”

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ERSHADINIA MOHAMMADREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

974

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ASHTIANI’S OBJECTIONS TO MUDARRES’S THEORY OF “BODILY RESURRECTION”

Author(s)

ERSHADINIA MOHAMMADREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

AQA ALI MUDARRESQ2

SAYYED JALAL AL-DIN ASHTIANIQ1

BODILY RESURRECTIONQ3

SELF-KNOWLEDGEQ2

Abstract

Relying on the applicability of principles of Transcendent Philosophy for reconstructing religious beliefs, AQA ALI MUDARRES has tried to give a new explanation of “bodily resurrection”. He does this by appealing to the purely Sadraian philosophical principles as well as his method in which he begins by agreeing with popular beliefs and ends with a departure from them. Appealing to some Sadraian ontological principles as “substantial motion” as well as his principles of SELF-KNOWLEDGE, Mudarres explains BODILY RESURRECTION to be the return of the mundane body to the soul in resurrection. Thus, neither does he assume that the mundane body is the destination of the soul, nor he asserts, as Sadra does, that the soul itself is subject to resurrection. Ashtiani have raised many objections against Mudarres’s theory, which include the continuance of the relation between body and soul after death, the continuance of substantial motion after detachment of the soul, tendency to the Ash’arite theories and the very objections which can be raised against the Ash’arite theory of BODILY RESURRECTION. Reviewing the Sadraian principles and the dispute between Mudarres and Ashtiani represents the dynamism of Sadraian philosophy during the centuries.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ERSHADINIA, MOHAMMADREZA. (2016). ASHTIANI’S OBJECTIONS TO MUDARRES’S THEORY OF “BODILY RESURRECTION”. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), 13(2 (26)), 1-25. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125843/en

Vancouver: Copy

ERSHADINIA MOHAMMADREZA. ASHTIANI’S OBJECTIONS TO MUDARRES’S THEORY OF “BODILY RESURRECTION”. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT)[Internet]. 2016;13(2 (26)):1-25. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125843/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMADREZA ERSHADINIA, “ASHTIANI’S OBJECTIONS TO MUDARRES’S THEORY OF “BODILY RESURRECTION”,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), vol. 13, no. 2 (26), pp. 1–25, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125843/en

Related Journal Papers