Theological Models of Lindbeck and Phillips: A Comparison

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Mazari Seyed Amirreza; Massoudi Jahangir

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT) Year:2018 | Volume:16 | Issue:1 (31) Page(s): 211-224

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

382

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Theological Models of Lindbeck and Phillips: A Comparison

Author(s)

Mazari Seyed Amirreza | Massoudi Jahangir | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Theological ModelQ1

Cultural-linguistic ApproachQ1

WittgensteinQ2

George LindbeckQ1

D.Z.PhillipsQ1

Abstract

One of the controversial topics in philosophy of religion is the Wittgensteinian Theological Models based on his notions of language game and lifestyle. Ostensibly, all these models result from the thoughts of the same person and have been at times subject to the same criticisms. However, some of the models have been more capable of offering convincing responses to those criticisms. The current study aims to investigate two popular models based on Wittgensteinian ideas. The first one is George Lindbeck’ s Cultural-linguistic Approach in the field of religion and theology and the second is D. Z. Phillips’ s model based on the philosophy of later Wittgenstein. They both have sought to provide appropriate responses to the criticisms which are based on the universality of rationality. It will be shown, however, that the approach adopted by Lindbeck has been of more success, because it has managed to compensate for the flaws found in the model Phillips has come up with.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Mazari, Seyed Amirreza, & Massoudi, Jahangir. (2018). Theological Models of Lindbeck and Phillips: A Comparison. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), 16(1 (31) ), 211-224. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125902/en

Vancouver: Copy

Mazari Seyed Amirreza, Massoudi Jahangir. Theological Models of Lindbeck and Phillips: A Comparison. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT)[Internet]. 2018;16(1 (31) ):211-224. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125902/en

IEEE: Copy

Seyed Amirreza Mazari, and Jahangir Massoudi, “Theological Models of Lindbeck and Phillips: A Comparison,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), vol. 16, no. 1 (31) , pp. 211–224, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125902/en

Related Journal Papers