EVALUATION OF FRANKFURT'S VIEWPOINT IN THE FACE OF INDIRECT CONSEQUENCE ARGUMENT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DANESH JAVAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT) Year:2017 | Volume:15 | Issue:1 (29) Page(s): 55-76

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

704

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF FRANKFURT'S VIEWPOINT IN THE FACE OF INDIRECT CONSEQUENCE ARGUMENT

Author(s)

DANESH JAVAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INDIRECT ARGUMENTQ1

MORAL RESPONSIBILITYQ2

THE PRINCIPLE OF ALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITIESQ1

FRANKFURTQ1

VAN INWAGENQ1

Abstract

The different versions of VAN INWAGEN’s INDIRECT ARGUMENT for the incompatibility of causal determinism and MORAL RESPONSIBILITY asserts that (1) the causal necessity and determination indicates that human actions are the results of past events and the laws of nature and thus does not have any alternative possibilities, while (2) every type of human free will and MORAL RESPONSIBILITY is based on such an alternative possibility to be capable of being chosen. Agreeing with the incompatibility of causal determination and THE PRINCIPLE OF ALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITIES (PAP), FRANKFURT tries to call the dependence of MORAL RESPONSIBILITY on the PAP into question. It seems, however, that the FRANKFURT-style approach against the INDIRECT ARGUMENT suffers from being ambiguous in the status of the intervener. It is also incapable of explaining the significance and function of alternative possibility.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DANESH, JAVAD. (2017). EVALUATION OF FRANKFURT'S VIEWPOINT IN THE FACE OF INDIRECT CONSEQUENCE ARGUMENT. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), 15(1 (29) ), 55-76. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125944/en

Vancouver: Copy

DANESH JAVAD. EVALUATION OF FRANKFURT'S VIEWPOINT IN THE FACE OF INDIRECT CONSEQUENCE ARGUMENT. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT)[Internet]. 2017;15(1 (29) ):55-76. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125944/en

IEEE: Copy

JAVAD DANESH, “EVALUATION OF FRANKFURT'S VIEWPOINT IN THE FACE OF INDIRECT CONSEQUENCE ARGUMENT,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), vol. 15, no. 1 (29) , pp. 55–76, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125944/en

Related Journal Papers