مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

745
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

ACCURACY OF DIGITAL SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY IN DETECTION OF ARTIFICIAL EXTERNAL ROOT RESORPTION (IN VITRO)

Pages

  141-148

Abstract

 Introduction: EXTERNAL ROOT RESORPTION refers to the loss of cementum and/or dentin from the root of the teeth. 40% mineral loss occurs in conventional radiographies but DIGITAL SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY is capable of localizing a lesion with only 1-5% mineral loss. This in vitro study aimed to determine the accuracy of DIGITAL SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY in diagnosis of simulated EXTERNAL ROOT RESORPTION.Methods and Materials: Ten premolar teeth with clinically intact roots were used were fixed in suitable place between the X-ray tube and CCD sensor. Direct digital radiographs were obtained before and after each lesion was created by 1/2, 1, 2, 4 and 6 round dental burs at facial and proximal surfaces; then digital subtraction images were obtained and observers evaluated all of the images and sensitivity and specificity and accuracy were calculated. Results were compared by J2test.Results: The sensitivity of digital subtraction and direct digital methods in detecting proximal defects were 97.34% and 93.92% respectively (p value = 0.16). The sensitivity of digital subtraction and DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY in facial surfaces were 98% and 92.6% respectively (p value =0.03). The specificity of direct digital and subtraction methods in proximal surfaces were 91.92%and 96.52% (p value = 0.08) and in facial surfaces were 91.92% and 99.26% respectively (p value= 0.002). The accuracy of DIGITAL SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY in detecting facial lesion was significantly superior to DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.Conclusion: DIGITAL SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY was superior to DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY in detecting small external root resorptive defects.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GHAFARI, ROUSHANAK, & KESHAVARZI, MARYAM. (2008). ACCURACY OF DIGITAL SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY IN DETECTION OF ARTIFICIAL EXTERNAL ROOT RESORPTION (IN VITRO). JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN DENTAL SCHOOL, 4(3), 141-148. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/126276/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GHAFARI ROUSHANAK, KESHAVARZI MARYAM. ACCURACY OF DIGITAL SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY IN DETECTION OF ARTIFICIAL EXTERNAL ROOT RESORPTION (IN VITRO). JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN DENTAL SCHOOL[Internet]. 2008;4(3):141-148. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/126276/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ROUSHANAK GHAFARI, and MARYAM KESHAVARZI, “ACCURACY OF DIGITAL SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY IN DETECTION OF ARTIFICIAL EXTERNAL ROOT RESORPTION (IN VITRO),” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN DENTAL SCHOOL, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 141–148, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/126276/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button