مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,134
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DEVELOPING A NEW MODEL FOR ASSESSING AND RANKING OF ORGANIZATIONS’ HSE PERFORMANCE

Pages

  95-106

Abstract

 Background and aims: HSE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT is one of the most important necessities for progress, development, and sustainability of organizations. Apparently, the previous HSE PERFORMANCE models have not considered all of the contributed CRITERIA. On the other hand, foreign models cannot culturally be applied in describing HSE PERFORMANCE in Iranian organizations. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of developing a new model for assessing and ranking of organizations HSE PERFORMANCE.Methods: In this expanding practical study, firstly, previous existed HSE PERFORMANCE models were identified; afterwards, common and distinct CRITERIA were extracted.Simultaneously, interviewing with experts was done and performance evaluating CRITERIA were recognized. For each criterion, some sub CRITERIA and for each sub criterion, some guidance points were extracted. Finally, the weights of CRITERIA and sub CRITERIA were detected by paired comparison and Fuzzy analytical hierarchical process.Results: HSE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT model was made of 9 CRITERIA including safety RESULTS, health RESULTS, environment RESULTS, processes, economical and sociocultural RESULTS, policy and strategy, leadership, partnerships and resources, and human resources weighted respectively with 19 subcriteria and 157 guidance points.Conclusion: RESULTS CRITERIA weighted more in comparison with ENABLERs CRITERIA (59% and 41%, respectively). Three CRITERIA including processes, policy and strategy, and leadership weighted partly 70 percent of ENABLERs weights. Safety RESULTS gained the greatest rank and 28 percent of the RESULTS weight.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    PEYSEPAR, SAYYAD, GHOLAMNIA, REZA, & MATIN, AMIR HOSSEIN. (2018). DEVELOPING A NEW MODEL FOR ASSESSING AND RANKING OF ORGANIZATIONS’ HSE PERFORMANCE. IRAN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 14(5 ), 95-106. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/129043/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    PEYSEPAR SAYYAD, GHOLAMNIA REZA, MATIN AMIR HOSSEIN. DEVELOPING A NEW MODEL FOR ASSESSING AND RANKING OF ORGANIZATIONS’ HSE PERFORMANCE. IRAN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH JOURNAL[Internet]. 2018;14(5 ):95-106. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/129043/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SAYYAD PEYSEPAR, REZA GHOLAMNIA, and AMIR HOSSEIN MATIN, “DEVELOPING A NEW MODEL FOR ASSESSING AND RANKING OF ORGANIZATIONS’ HSE PERFORMANCE,” IRAN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH JOURNAL, vol. 14, no. 5 , pp. 95–106, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/129043/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button