A Critical Study on the View of Those Refuting Religious Science with Regard to the Norm for Distinguishing Religious Science from Nonreligious Science

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAHDAVI MOHAMMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI Year:2017 | Volume:12 | Issue:47 Page(s): 139-154

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

373

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Critical Study on the View of Those Refuting Religious Science with Regard to the Norm for Distinguishing Religious Science from Nonreligious Science

Author(s)

MAHDAVI MOHAMMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Religious ScienceQ1

DistinctQ2

SubjectQ2

MethodQ1

GoalQ2

Abstract

The study has intended to survey the view of those refuting Religious Science. As they believe, there may not be found any norm by which one may attain Religious Science and nonReligious Science separately. They study Subject, Method and Goal of science with regard to two levels of mind and objective reality. In the case of the latter, they disagree any meaning of religiousness, while in the former, they separate the position of judgement from that of gathering and claim that only on the position of gathering one may speak of Religious Science. And finally it has been concluded that their explanation is based upon a fallacy in which the two positions of mind and objective reality have been replaced misleadingly, some of their claims oppose their epistemological principles, and some of their claims lack any proof and oppose what happened in the history of scienc.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MAHDAVI, MOHAMMAD. (2017). A Critical Study on the View of Those Refuting Religious Science with Regard to the Norm for Distinguishing Religious Science from Nonreligious Science. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, 12(47 ), 139-154. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/133578/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAHDAVI MOHAMMAD. A Critical Study on the View of Those Refuting Religious Science with Regard to the Norm for Distinguishing Religious Science from Nonreligious Science. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI[Internet]. 2017;12(47 ):139-154. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/133578/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD MAHDAVI, “A Critical Study on the View of Those Refuting Religious Science with Regard to the Norm for Distinguishing Religious Science from Nonreligious Science,” ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, vol. 12, no. 47 , pp. 139–154, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/133578/en

Related Journal Papers