A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON FIVE APPROACHS OF EVIL IN ANIMALS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

QORBANI HASHEM; QAREJALOO DAVOOD

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI Year:2014 | Volume:9 | Issue:35 Page(s): 169-185

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

898

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON FIVE APPROACHS OF EVIL IN ANIMALS

Author(s)

QORBANI HASHEM | QAREJALOO DAVOOD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PROBLEM OF EVILQ2

PAIN AND SUFFERINGQ2

ANIMALSQ1

PERCEPTIONSQ2

CRITICAL ANALYSISQ2

Abstract

This paper is essentially concerned to five contemporary common views of the PROBLEM OF EVIL in animal. As one may talk of the problem in human being, so is the case, when considering it with regard to the world of ANIMALS. The importance of the problem would be more clear when noticing the difficulties in the way of defending free will in ANIMALS. The PROBLEM OF EVIL lies in perception, collision and the possibility for perceiving collision. In this way, limiting the proble in human being would lead to redutivism. William Rowe has put the problem forward again. Some scholars have sought to solve the proble. This paper, agreeing with the problem to be proposed in ANIMALS, has intended to report and criticize the views presented as answer in five approaches including those of Lewis, Harrison, Hick, Peter Geach and Swinburne respectively focusing on determining the agent for evil, lack of knowledge in ANIMALS, distincting pain from suffering, not paying any attention to evil in ANIMALS and its being agent for knowledge.

Cites

No record.

References

تحلیل مساله شر با تاکید بر آرای فلسفی و کلامی امام خمینی (ره)

Cite

APA: Copy

QORBANI, HASHEM, & QAREJALOO, DAVOOD. (2014). A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON FIVE APPROACHS OF EVIL IN ANIMALS. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, 9(35), 169-185. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/133629/en

Vancouver: Copy

QORBANI HASHEM, QAREJALOO DAVOOD. A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON FIVE APPROACHS OF EVIL IN ANIMALS. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI[Internet]. 2014;9(35):169-185. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/133629/en

IEEE: Copy

HASHEM QORBANI, and DAVOOD QAREJALOO, “A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON FIVE APPROACHS OF EVIL IN ANIMALS,” ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, vol. 9, no. 35, pp. 169–185, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/133629/en

Related Journal Papers