A STUDY ON THE ARGUEMENTS OF THOSE AGREEING WITH EPISTEMOLOGICAL VALIDITY OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NASIRI MANSOUR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI Year:2014 | Volume:9 | Issue:35 Page(s): 45-62

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,113

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A STUDY ON THE ARGUEMENTS OF THOSE AGREEING WITH EPISTEMOLOGICAL VALIDITY OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE

Author(s)

NASIRI MANSOUR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EXPERIENCEQ2

RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCEQ2

SENSULISMQ1

EMOTIONALISMQ1

METANATURAL EXPLANATIONQ2

KNOWLEDGE BY PERSISTENCEQ2

ALESTONQ2

WAINWRIGHTQ2

IBN ARABIQ2

Abstract

This paper has focused on the arguements of those agreeing with epistemological validity of religious EXPERIENCE and studied them in five groups: 1. arguing as if religious EXPERIENCEs are the same as visible EXPERIENCEs; 2. arguing on the principle of credulity and testimony; 3. arguing by inferring the best explanation; 4. reformed argument of Gutting; 5. arguing on the basis of KNOWLEDGE BY PERSISTENCE. As is described in the paper, all the arguments are exposed to failures. In the paper, general authenticity of religious EXPERIENCE has been argued against; yet a limited authenticity for religious EXPERIENCE has been argued in the field.

Cites

THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF JEFF JORDAN’S VIEW ON RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE AND ITS NATURALISTIC EXPLANATION

References

Cite

APA: Copy

NASIRI, MANSOUR. (2014). A STUDY ON THE ARGUEMENTS OF THOSE AGREEING WITH EPISTEMOLOGICAL VALIDITY OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, 9(35), 45-62. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/133632/en

Vancouver: Copy

NASIRI MANSOUR. A STUDY ON THE ARGUEMENTS OF THOSE AGREEING WITH EPISTEMOLOGICAL VALIDITY OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI[Internet]. 2014;9(35):45-62. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/133632/en

IEEE: Copy

MANSOUR NASIRI, “A STUDY ON THE ARGUEMENTS OF THOSE AGREEING WITH EPISTEMOLOGICAL VALIDITY OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE,” ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, vol. 9, no. 35, pp. 45–62, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/133632/en

Related Journal Papers