A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EVALUATION CONCERNING ISLAMIC AND MAINSTREAM ADMINISTRATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BAHARESTAN J.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Year:2002 | Volume:18 | Issue:2 (36) Page(s): 56-71

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,150

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EVALUATION CONCERNING ISLAMIC AND MAINSTREAM ADMINISTRATION

Author(s)

BAHARESTAN J. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

This article aims to compare the evaluating processes concerning Islamic and Mainstream administration.The research questions are as follows:1. Does evaluation process exist in Islam?2. What is the difference between evaluation in Islam and evaluation in .Mainstream administration?The hypothesis to the above research questions can be represented as:1. On the basis of valid reasons, it can be stated that Islam in seriously concerned with evaluation.2. The difference between Islamic and Mainstream Administration is explicitly clear, for instance, in Islamic Administration the emphasis is on the performer of the action rather than on the performance.This research is library-oriented one and the method it applies is theoretical analytical. To confirm the first hypothesis, the research emphasizes on the following five reasons:1. Based on the innate principles of human nature, man is endowed with goals, wisdom, conscience and divine disposition and the belief that the two guardian angels which are witnessing his good and bad deeds, man is apt to evaluate his own act:and take progressive steps towards goodness and perfection.2. The belief in Resurrection and the Day of Judgement as the primary principles directing man to decent and good actions and stopping him from indecent and obscene acts makes evaluation as an integral element of Islamic Law.3. Since the principles of Examination and Trial are divine traditions that lead man to his spiritual growth, all human beings without exception, are liable to divine examination and trial. Basically, the philosophy of life and death is itself an examination and trial.4. Both the various verses of the Holy Quran and the' large number of Hadiths have reflected on examinations, calamities, catastrophist and divine justice thus signifying explicitly evidences of examination and trial.5. The evaluation and supervision in Islamic Administration is based on Imam Ali's religious speeches, letters and judicious knowledge in Nahjul - Balaghe. Moreover, to confirm the 'second hypothesis, first, the different concepts of evaluation, aims and criteria of evaluation and their different methods are compared and contrasted in Islamic and Mainstream Administration. Finally, the differences in Islamic evaluation and Mainstream evaluation are studied in terms of performance and performer, the difference between the concept of science and knowledge, and between the behavioral objectives and ultimate goals. Considering the limitations of mainstream evaluation in terms of temporal and spatial factors, Mainstream Administration turns out to be liable to numerous shortcomings due to political, economical and social interests. Therefore, it is confirmed that Divine Justice is infallible in its evaluation while mainstream evaluation, more or less, compromises with the existing situations. And more often, partiality and prejudice prevail over logical reasoning. Thus, observance of discriminations becomes more prominent than consideration of differences.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

BAHARESTAN, J.. (2002). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EVALUATION CONCERNING ISLAMIC AND MAINSTREAM ADMINISTRATION. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES OF SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY, 18(2 (36)), 56-71. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/13480/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAHARESTAN J.. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EVALUATION CONCERNING ISLAMIC AND MAINSTREAM ADMINISTRATION. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES OF SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY[Internet]. 2002;18(2 (36)):56-71. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/13480/en

IEEE: Copy

J. BAHARESTAN, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EVALUATION CONCERNING ISLAMIC AND MAINSTREAM ADMINISTRATION,” JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES OF SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY, vol. 18, no. 2 (36), pp. 56–71, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/13480/en

Related Journal Papers