INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN LAW AND CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC SCHOLARS’ OPINION ABOUT THE IDENTITY AND RIGHTS OF THE LABORATORY CHILD

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FARAMARZI RAZINI FATEMEH; SALEHI SEYYED MAHDI; Ghoreishi Sayed Mahdi; SALARZAEE AMIR HAMZEH; GHASEMZADEH NAZAFARIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Year:2016 | Volume:9 | Issue:4 Page(s): 43-55

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,369

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN LAW AND CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC SCHOLARS’ OPINION ABOUT THE IDENTITY AND RIGHTS OF THE LABORATORY CHILD

Author(s)

Keywords

IN VITRO FERTILIZATIONQ2

ARTSQ3

EMBRYO DONATIONQ2

LEGAL PARENTSQ2

Abstract

Reproduction and fertility are considered a substantial need for the survival of the human race and has seen its ups and downs. Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ARTs) have brought some changes as well as challenge in human reproduction. For instance, involvement of a third-party in pregnancy has become a challenging practice. Given the rapid application of ARTS in Iran, obscure aspects and consequences associated with this technology need to be elaborated. The present study aimed at investigating the identity and rights of children resulting from ARTS based on the existing laws and the opinions of the contemporary Shi’ite Grand Ayatollahs. First, by reviewing the sources of Islamic law as well as searching the legal and reliable electronic resources -using key terms such as parentage, guardianship, EMBRYO DONATION and infertility- the existing laws and regulations about ARTS have been analyzed. Then, by a qualitative method, written opinions of some contemporary Shi’ite Grand Ayatollahs regarding the identity and the rights of a child born by involvement of a third party were collected. The result shows inconsistency between the opinion of the contemporary Islamic jurists and the existing law about EMBRYO DONATION. Islamic Jurists believe that the child of EMBRYO DONATION does not belong to the recipient couple. However, according to the EMBRYO DONATION Act, in particular with regard to the duties placed upon infertile couples, who receive the donated embryo, implicitly accept the recipient couple as the parents of the child. This eventually leaves the child with an identity crisis besides deprivation of citizenship rights in some cases. Accordingly, as the current rules and legislations of Iran conflicts with views of the Islamic jurists, to resolve this problem, a revision to accept the recipients as LEGAL PARENTS of the child is necessary.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

FARAMARZI RAZINI, FATEMEH, SALEHI, SEYYED MAHDI, Ghoreishi, Sayed Mahdi, SALARZAEE, AMIR HAMZEH, & GHASEMZADEH, NAZAFARIN. (2016). INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN LAW AND CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC SCHOLARS’ OPINION ABOUT THE IDENTITY AND RIGHTS OF THE LABORATORY CHILD. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS AND HISTORY OF MEDICINE, 9(4), 43-55. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/135438/en

Vancouver: Copy

FARAMARZI RAZINI FATEMEH, SALEHI SEYYED MAHDI, Ghoreishi Sayed Mahdi, SALARZAEE AMIR HAMZEH, GHASEMZADEH NAZAFARIN. INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN LAW AND CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC SCHOLARS’ OPINION ABOUT THE IDENTITY AND RIGHTS OF THE LABORATORY CHILD. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS AND HISTORY OF MEDICINE[Internet]. 2016;9(4):43-55. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/135438/en

IEEE: Copy

FATEMEH FARAMARZI RAZINI, SEYYED MAHDI SALEHI, Sayed Mahdi Ghoreishi, AMIR HAMZEH SALARZAEE, and NAZAFARIN GHASEMZADEH, “INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN LAW AND CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC SCHOLARS’ OPINION ABOUT THE IDENTITY AND RIGHTS OF THE LABORATORY CHILD,” JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS AND HISTORY OF MEDICINE, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 43–55, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/135438/en

Related Journal Papers