مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

752
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EFFICIENCY OF GRASSMASTER COMPARED WITH CLIPPING AND WEIGHING METHOD FOR YIELD ESTIMATION IN GRASSLANDS, SHRUBLANDS AND ALFA ALFA FIELDS

Pages

  240-249

Abstract

 The amount of forage PRODUCTION is basically used to determine grazing capacity. Measuring the amount of rangeland PRODUCTION to determine the carrying capacity, is one of the most important factor. Various methods depend on vegetation type, density, percentages of canopy cover, affordable time, accuracy, experts experience, etc., have been proposed. Measuring the amount of forage PRODUCTION with clipping and weighting method is the most reliable method, but it is time consuming and expensive. So we must choose an accurate and simple method with less cost and time consumption. One of these methods is application of grassmaster that is one of the CAPACITANCE METER type. The objective of research was investigation on grassmaster efficiency comparing with clipping and weighting method in three types of GRASSLAND, ALFA-ALFA FIELDS and SHRUBLANDs in two growth stages (flowering and seed ripening). In each habitat along 2 transects, 200 plots (1m2) were used. In each plot PRODUCTION with clipping and weighting method and with grassmaster was measured. Data were analysed using SPSS version 15 software. The Results showed that grassmaster in SHRUBLAND didn’t record any data. Therefore, grassmaster is not suitable for SHRUBLANDs. In GRASSLAND and alfa-alfa field according to correlation coefficients, results were as follows: GRASSLANDs in flowering stage (97%), seed ripening stage (92%), cultivated alfa-alfa in flowering stage (61%), seed ripening stage (27%). So the best efficiency obtained for GRASSLANDs.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ARZANI, H., MOVAGHARI, M., ASAARZADEH, A., CHAREHSAZ, N., ZARE CHAHOUKI, M.A., & AHMADI BEIRAGANI, H.. (2011). EFFICIENCY OF GRASSMASTER COMPARED WITH CLIPPING AND WEIGHING METHOD FOR YIELD ESTIMATION IN GRASSLANDS, SHRUBLANDS AND ALFA ALFA FIELDS. RANGELAND, 5(3), 240-249. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/136339/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ARZANI H., MOVAGHARI M., ASAARZADEH A., CHAREHSAZ N., ZARE CHAHOUKI M.A., AHMADI BEIRAGANI H.. EFFICIENCY OF GRASSMASTER COMPARED WITH CLIPPING AND WEIGHING METHOD FOR YIELD ESTIMATION IN GRASSLANDS, SHRUBLANDS AND ALFA ALFA FIELDS. RANGELAND[Internet]. 2011;5(3):240-249. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/136339/en

    IEEE: Copy

    H. ARZANI, M. MOVAGHARI, A. ASAARZADEH, N. CHAREHSAZ, M.A. ZARE CHAHOUKI, and H. AHMADI BEIRAGANI, “EFFICIENCY OF GRASSMASTER COMPARED WITH CLIPPING AND WEIGHING METHOD FOR YIELD ESTIMATION IN GRASSLANDS, SHRUBLANDS AND ALFA ALFA FIELDS,” RANGELAND, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 240–249, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/136339/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button