The Adversary Principle in Criminal Proceedings

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ashrafy mahmood; ZERAAT ABBAS

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL Year:2018 | Volume:82 | Issue:101 Page(s): 11-35

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

4,599

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Adversary Principle in Criminal Proceedings

Author(s)

ashrafy mahmood | ZERAAT ABBAS | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Equality of ArmsQ1

Fair TrialQ1

Adversarial ProceedingsQ1

Criminal ProcessQ2

Abstract

The contradictoriness is one of the fundamental principles in any proceedings. However, the concept of this principle in the criminal proceedings which has a fundamental difference with civil procedure especially because of existence of the preliminary investigation and the possibility of taking decisions without listening to statements and reasons of criminal claim parties, also the limits of implementation of this principle are not clear. So it is necessary to considering how to apply this principle, particularly in relation to the Criminal Procedure Act 1392, which seeks to further the adversarial Criminal Process such as a civil proceeding. contradictoriness in criminal procedure means that no decision against one of the public claim in any stages of the proceedings (prosecution, investigation and trial) should be made just after hearing testimony and considering evidences of public claim parties (accused and prosecutor). This principle is not explicitly mentioned by Criminal Procedure Act 1392 but the contradictoriness implicitly is accepted and the most important examples of implementation of this principle in this Act such as adversarial processing in the preliminary investigation stage in forgivable crimes and in the trial stage in the court, accessing to lawyer, prohibition of obtaining any defense bill, new document and evidence pursuant of announcement of termination of proceedings has been mentioned. However with regards to the unequal status of public claim’ s parties and international documents emphasis on improving accused's status through using human rights instructions including applying of the principle of contradictoriness in the criminal procedure so here we will mention examples in the Criminal Procedure Act 2013 in violation of contradictoriness against accused.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ashrafy, mahmood, & ZERAAT, ABBAS. (2018). The Adversary Principle in Criminal Proceedings. THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL, 82(101 ), 11-35. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/137847/en

Vancouver: Copy

ashrafy mahmood, ZERAAT ABBAS. The Adversary Principle in Criminal Proceedings. THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL[Internet]. 2018;82(101 ):11-35. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/137847/en

IEEE: Copy

mahmood ashrafy, and ABBAS ZERAAT, “The Adversary Principle in Criminal Proceedings,” THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL, vol. 82, no. 101 , pp. 11–35, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/137847/en

Related Journal Papers