Patient Sheared Decision‐ Making Models: A Comparative Study

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Vaskouei Eshkevarei Khorshid; HAJINABI KAMRAN; RIAHI LEILA; MALEKI MOHAMMADREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Nursing Research Year:2019 | Volume:13 | Issue:6 Page(s): 83-93

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

827

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Patient Sheared Decision‐ Making Models: A Comparative Study

Author(s)

Vaskouei Eshkevarei Khorshid | HAJINABI KAMRAN | RIAHI LEILA | MALEKI MOHAMMADREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ParticipationQ2

Decision-makingQ2

TreatmentQ1

PatientQ2

ModelQ1

Abstract

Introduction: Health policies and medical approaches have been changed with respect to the spread of chronic diseases. Patient Participation in clinical Decision-making promotes health indicators and results. Despite, this concept and its operational implementation strategies are unfamiliar in most countries. The aim of this study was to compare the Models of Patient Participation in clinical Decision-making, to present executive strategies to improve this process in the country. Methods: A comparative descriptive design was adopted based on the Beredy, method. So, four stages were presented: description, interpretation, juxtaposition, and comparison. This study has compared 14 Models for Patient Participation in clinical Decision-making in different aspects. Eight clinical experts who participated in the qualitative research have determined the evaluation indicators. Results: In examining the fourteen Models in the field of Patient shared Decision-making, the results indicate that these Models are based on the context, the relationship between physician and Patient, Patient preferences 100%, practitioner's behavior, Patient empowerment 64%, beliefs and The Patient's values, the existence of different Treatment options of 57%, control over Decision-making 50%, Patient outcome implications 43%, Patient characteristics 36% The role of physician in the community and supporting Patient Decision-making in the society were 21%. Conclusions: Based on this study, effective components of Patient Participation in Decision-making have been extracted. The results of this study will be used to design sheared Decision-making Model.

Cites

Factors Affecting the Development of Age-Friendly Hospitals in Iran: A Factor Analysis

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Vaskouei Eshkevarei, Khorshid, HAJINABI, KAMRAN, RIAHI, LEILA, & MALEKI, MOHAMMADREZA. (2019). Patient Sheared Decision‐ Making Models: A Comparative Study. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 13(6 ), 83-93. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/138306/en

Vancouver: Copy

Vaskouei Eshkevarei Khorshid, HAJINABI KAMRAN, RIAHI LEILA, MALEKI MOHAMMADREZA. Patient Sheared Decision‐ Making Models: A Comparative Study. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH[Internet]. 2019;13(6 ):83-93. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/138306/en

IEEE: Copy

Khorshid Vaskouei Eshkevarei, KAMRAN HAJINABI, LEILA RIAHI, and MOHAMMADREZA MALEKI, “Patient Sheared Decision‐ Making Models: A Comparative Study,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, vol. 13, no. 6 , pp. 83–93, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/138306/en

Related Journal Papers