Evaluating the Accuracy of Large Language Model (ChatGPT) in Providing Information on Metastatic Breast Cancer

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Gummadi Ramakrishna; Dasari Nagasen; Kumar D. Sathis; Pindiprolu Sai Kiran S.S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin Year:2024 | Volume:14 | Issue:3 Page(s): 499-503

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Evaluating the Accuracy of Large Language Model (ChatGPT) in Providing Information on Metastatic Breast Cancer

Author(s)

Gummadi Ramakrishna | Dasari Nagasen | Kumar D. Sathis | Pindiprolu Sai Kiran S.S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Keywords: Artificial intelligenceQ4

ChatGPTQ4

Breast cancerQ4

Patient educationQ4

HealthcareQ4

Abstract

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models like ChatGPT developed by OpenAI, has demonstrated potential in various domains, including medicine. While ChatGPT has shown the capability to pass rigorous exams like the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1, its proficiency in addressing Breast cancer-related inquiries—a complex and prevalent disease—remains underexplored. This study aims to assess the accuracy and comprehensiveness of ChatGPT’s responses to common Breast cancer questions, addressing a critical gap in the literature and evaluating its potential in enhancing Patient education and support in Breast cancer management. Methods: A curated list of 100 frequently asked Breast cancer questions was compiled from Cancer.net, the National Breast cancer Foundation, and clinical practice. These questions were input into ChatGPT, and the responses were evaluated for accuracy by two primary experts using a four-point scale. Discrepancies in scoring were resolved through additional expert review. Results: Of the 100 responses, 5 were entirely inaccurate, 22 partially accurate, 42 accurate but lacking comprehensiveness, and 31 highly accurate. The majority of the responses were found to be at least partially accurate, demonstrating ChatGPT’s potential in providing reliable information on Breast cancer. Conclusion: ChatGPT shows promise as a supplementary tool for Patient education on Breast cancer. While generally accurate, the presence of inaccuracies underscores the need for professional oversight. The study advocates for integrating AI tools like ChatGPT in Healthcare settings to support patient-provider interactions and health education, emphasizing the importance of regular updates to reflect the latest research and clinical guidelines.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops