A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO FEEDBACK METHODS ON IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS' WRITING SKILL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAFTOUN P.; ZARE EKBATANI A.R.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES Year:2005 | Volume:15 | Issue:54 Page(s): 85-109

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

860

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO FEEDBACK METHODS ON IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS' WRITING SKILL

Author(s)

MAFTOUN P. | ZARE EKBATANI A.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ANALYTIC MARKINGQ4

AUDIOTAPED FEEDBACKQ4

HOLISTIC MARKINGQ4

MINIMAL MARKINGQ4

MULTIPLE RATERSQ4

WRITINGQ2

Abstract

The present study was conducted to compare the Iranian EFL learners' WRITING performances when receiving two different feedback styles: Audio taped feedback (ATF) and MINIMAL MARKING (MM). Eighty four male participants of this study were chosen from among 136 early intermediate EFL learners who were selected through the cluster sampling of students at Kish Language institute. The classes under study were randomly divided into two groups: the ATF Group and the MM Group, each with 42 eligible participants, who were again checked to be homogeneous through a homogeneity test. During the course of this study, i.e., 36 sessions, the participants were assigned to write expository paragraphs of about 150 words on eight WRITING topics. One of the groups received ATF on their scripts, and the other group received MM Two tests were used to compare the WRITING performances of the groups: a pre-test prior to the treatment and a post-test after the treatment, both in the form of in-class expository paragraphs of about 150 words under a time limit of 40 minutes. Data analyses and statistical calculations indicated that (a) the ATF Group performed better on the post-test, (b) the MM Group's performance on the post-test did not show any improvement over the pre-test, and, lastly, (c) the ATF Group performed better than the MM Group on the post-test.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MAFTOUN, P., & ZARE EKBATANI, A.R.. (2005). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO FEEDBACK METHODS ON IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS' WRITING SKILL. JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES, 15(54), 85-109. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/13951/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAFTOUN P., ZARE EKBATANI A.R.. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO FEEDBACK METHODS ON IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS' WRITING SKILL. JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES[Internet]. 2005;15(54):85-109. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/13951/en

IEEE: Copy

P. MAFTOUN, and A.R. ZARE EKBATANI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO FEEDBACK METHODS ON IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS' WRITING SKILL,” JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES, vol. 15, no. 54, pp. 85–109, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/13951/en

Related Journal Papers