مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

819
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DOUBLE TRUTH

Pages

  31-60

Abstract

 In both Christian and Islamic world, some writers have accused averroes (Ibn rushd) and his followers (averroists) of believing to and defending of DOUBLE TRUTH: that phiiosophica.1facts and RELIGIOUS FACTS despite their inconsistency can both be true. But this charge is true or is a mere accusation? This article examines this matter. We should distinguish between for meaning of DOUBLE TRUTH: a) the idea that some people can believe in a proposition and others are justified in believing to its contrary. B) The idea that a person can in a given time believes to a proposition and in another time approves its contrary. C) The idea that a person epistemologically is justified to believe in a proposition and at the same time accept its contrary. D) The idea that, ontologically, in the field of reality the truth is twin, I. E 'both A and its contrary are in reality correct. We will prove that none of the averroists agree with D, and a few of them confirm c, and almost all of them approve A and B.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    TAVAKOLI, GH.H.. (2008). DOUBLE TRUTH. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ), 51(203), 31-60. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/140847/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    TAVAKOLI GH.H.. DOUBLE TRUTH. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ)[Internet]. 2008;51(203):31-60. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/140847/en

    IEEE: Copy

    GH.H. TAVAKOLI, “DOUBLE TRUTH,” PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ), vol. 51, no. 203, pp. 31–60, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/140847/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button