مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

448
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

183
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Kant's Theory of Judgment, Explicit Predication or Implicit one?

Pages

  247-270

Abstract

theory of judgment is a significant problem in contemporary philosophy. Epistemology, logic, semantics and cognitive psychology are important philosophical areas which deal with different faces of the theory of judgment. One of the greatest problems in contemporary Kant Studies concerns Kant’ s theory of judgment. Until 1970, an accepted reading of Kant’ s theory of judgment was widespread among Kant’ s English-speaking interpreters. Since 1970, some scholars began to understand and interpret Kant’ s theory of judgment in a different way. This shift has led to huge and wide interpretivephilosophical discussions among Kant’ s scholars. According to some scholars, traces of two different theories of judgment are found in Kant’ s works: explicit theory of judgment and implicit theory of judgment. In this paper, considering interpretive viewpoints of some of Kant scholars, we contrast these two theories of predication and explicate their differences. Our conclusion is that Kant’ s implicit or hidden theory of judgment is more consistent with Kant’ s works and philosophical views. Moreover, one of the main implications of implicit theory of judgment is that we must interpret Chapter of schematism and logico-semantic structure of a priori synthetic judgments in a different way.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MESGARI, AHMAD ALI AKBAR, & Jamshidpour, Arash. (2019). Kant's Theory of Judgment, Explicit Predication or Implicit one?. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ), 13(26 ), 247-270. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/140895/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MESGARI AHMAD ALI AKBAR, Jamshidpour Arash. Kant's Theory of Judgment, Explicit Predication or Implicit one?. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ)[Internet]. 2019;13(26 ):247-270. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/140895/en

    IEEE: Copy

    AHMAD ALI AKBAR MESGARI, and Arash Jamshidpour, “Kant's Theory of Judgment, Explicit Predication or Implicit one?,” PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ), vol. 13, no. 26 , pp. 247–270, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/140895/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button