MYTH OF THE NATURE OF REASONING

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZIBAKALAM SAEED

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Philosophical Investigations in Scopus Year:2017 | Volume:10 | Issue:19 Page(s): 163-172

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

634

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MYTH OF THE NATURE OF REASONING

Author(s)

ZIBAKALAM SAEED | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NATURE OF REASONQ1

PERSUASIVENESSQ1

PHILOSOPHICAL POSITIONSQ1

THE IDEA OF REASONQ1

HISTORICITY OF REASONQ1

Abstract

In this paper, I have tried to discuss the following questions: Do reasons that have been/have not been put forward, all have a trans-historical and universal nature or essence? And has there been or will there be a unanimous consensus on that? Why do so many reasons in the history of philosophy that seemed convincing at a time have lost their cogency? When we say "I have become convinced by your reasons", do we mean that your reasons have characteristics that anyone in any historical era and with whatever cultural make-up who hears or reads it will become convinced?Do we have to ask for the convincingness or PERSUASIVENESS of reasons and its measure? Why is it that during the long history of argumentation, theorization, and taking of positions in philosophy, and during the not so long history of social sciences, there has not been a single position for which reasons have been advanced and those had convinced all those concerned?6. Why is it that roughly for the number of philosophers who have reflected on THE IDEA OF REASONing, there are different Ideas of reason.7. Are reasons necessary for acquiring important and/or interesting knowledge?

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZIBAKALAM, SAEED. (2017). MYTH OF THE NATURE OF REASONING. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ), 10(19 ), 163-172. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/140976/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZIBAKALAM SAEED. MYTH OF THE NATURE OF REASONING. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ)[Internet]. 2017;10(19 ):163-172. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/140976/en

IEEE: Copy

SAEED ZIBAKALAM, “MYTH OF THE NATURE OF REASONING,” PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ), vol. 10, no. 19 , pp. 163–172, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/140976/en

Related Journal Papers