EVALUATION OF RESISTANCE OF SOME BARLEY CULTIVARS AND ADVANCED LINES TO COVERED SMUT (USTILAGO HORDEI) AND COMPARISON OF INOCULATION METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INFECTION IN FIELD

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DADREZAEI S.T.; TORABI M.; LAKZADEH I.; TABATABAIE S.N.; ASLAHI M.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: SEED AND PLANT IMPROVEMENT JOURNAL Year:2013 | Volume:29-1 | Issue:2 Page(s): 369-384

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

858

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF RESISTANCE OF SOME BARLEY CULTIVARS AND ADVANCED LINES TO COVERED SMUT (USTILAGO HORDEI) AND COMPARISON OF INOCULATION METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INFECTION IN FIELD

Author(s)

Keywords

BARLEYQ2

COVERED SMUTQ2

RESISTANCEQ3

INOCULATION TECHNIQUESQ2

TELIOSPORE SUSPENSIONQ2

Abstract

Many BARLEY cultivars especially hull-less genotypes are susceptible to COVERED SMUT caused by Ustilago hordei (Pers.) Lagerh. Artificial inoculation of disease for RESISTANCE evaluation is also difficult and common methods of artificial inoculation are inefficient. The present study was conducted for three years to evaluate RESISTANCE of 27 hulled and hull-less BARLEY advanced lines and cultivars to COVERED SMUT with three inoculation methods. A factorial experiment based on complete randomized block design with three replications was performed for two years. Three inoculation methods including inoculation only in field by spore spraying, inoculation only in laboratory by spore suspension and inoculation in field+laboratory, together with a non-inoculated treatment (check) were considered as the first factor and BARLEY genotypes as the second factor. Number and percentage of infected heads were recorded at harvest time. Based on the results, inoculation in field+inoculation in laboratory was the most effective method for artificial infection of COVERED SMUT followed by inoculation only in laboratory. Inoculation only in field did not lead to induction of sufficient infection. Therefore, considering the easy application, inoculation only in laboratory can be recommended as the most practical method for artificial inoculation of the diseases. In this study line MOLA/SHYRI//ARUPO*2/JET/3/…. Was assessed as the highly resistant and cultivar Jonob as the highly susceptible genotypes.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DADREZAEI, S.T., TORABI, M., LAKZADEH, I., TABATABAIE, S.N., & ASLAHI, M.R.. (2013). EVALUATION OF RESISTANCE OF SOME BARLEY CULTIVARS AND ADVANCED LINES TO COVERED SMUT (USTILAGO HORDEI) AND COMPARISON OF INOCULATION METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INFECTION IN FIELD. SEED AND PLANT IMPROVEMENT JOURNAL, 29-1(2), 369-384. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/146997/en

Vancouver: Copy

DADREZAEI S.T., TORABI M., LAKZADEH I., TABATABAIE S.N., ASLAHI M.R.. EVALUATION OF RESISTANCE OF SOME BARLEY CULTIVARS AND ADVANCED LINES TO COVERED SMUT (USTILAGO HORDEI) AND COMPARISON OF INOCULATION METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INFECTION IN FIELD. SEED AND PLANT IMPROVEMENT JOURNAL[Internet]. 2013;29-1(2):369-384. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/146997/en

IEEE: Copy

S.T. DADREZAEI, M. TORABI, I. LAKZADEH, S.N. TABATABAIE, and M.R. ASLAHI, “EVALUATION OF RESISTANCE OF SOME BARLEY CULTIVARS AND ADVANCED LINES TO COVERED SMUT (USTILAGO HORDEI) AND COMPARISON OF INOCULATION METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INFECTION IN FIELD,” SEED AND PLANT IMPROVEMENT JOURNAL, vol. 29-1, no. 2, pp. 369–384, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/146997/en

Related Journal Papers