مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

776
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF POWER’S PARTICULAR LANGUAGE IN SIASAT NAMEH AND NASIHAT AL-MOLOOK

Pages

  35-54

Abstract

 The particular language is a term used for identifying the language of different texts’ style and is of special significance in stylistic distinctions. In identifying particular language, the three elements of word, syntactic structure and the context of discourse play a role and, amongst various kinds of particular language, IDEOLOGY has mostly a close relationship with THE PARTICULAR LANGUAGE OF POWER and employs the same code in the semiotic system. For strengthening the pillars of their power, the Seljuks converted to Islam and had recourse to the caliphates of Baghdad for fortifying it. Nizam al-Molk and Ghazali who were Shafei wrote SIASAT NAMEH AND NASIHAT AL-MOLOOK for guiding and helping the Seljuk kings in their governance. THE PARTICULAR LANGUAGE OF POWER in these two books is divided into LINGUISTIC AND NON-LINGUISTIC ACTS, and its ideological foundations are in accordance with Shafei religion but the difference lies in that Nizam al-Molk believed in eliminating and even killing the non-Shafeis whereas Ghazali believed in keeping the justice. Accordingly, the use of subjunctive and imperative verbs in the sense of absoluteness is one of the most prominent signs of ideological foundations of political language in both books.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    DARVISHALIPUR ASTANEH, LEILA, & BAGHERI KHALILI, ALIAKBAR. (2016). THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF POWER’S PARTICULAR LANGUAGE IN SIASAT NAMEH AND NASIHAT AL-MOLOOK. TEXTUAL CRITICISM OF PERSIAN LITERATURE (RESEARCHES ON PERSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE), 52 (NEW VOL. 8)(1 (29)), 35-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/149046/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    DARVISHALIPUR ASTANEH LEILA, BAGHERI KHALILI ALIAKBAR. THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF POWER’S PARTICULAR LANGUAGE IN SIASAT NAMEH AND NASIHAT AL-MOLOOK. TEXTUAL CRITICISM OF PERSIAN LITERATURE (RESEARCHES ON PERSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE)[Internet]. 2016;52 (NEW VOL. 8)(1 (29)):35-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/149046/en

    IEEE: Copy

    LEILA DARVISHALIPUR ASTANEH, and ALIAKBAR BAGHERI KHALILI, “THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF POWER’S PARTICULAR LANGUAGE IN SIASAT NAMEH AND NASIHAT AL-MOLOOK,” TEXTUAL CRITICISM OF PERSIAN LITERATURE (RESEARCHES ON PERSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE), vol. 52 (NEW VOL. 8), no. 1 (29), pp. 35–54, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/149046/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button