مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

19
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Determining the Ecological Sustainability of Pardisan Nature Park Based on Ecological Footprint

Author(s)

Shahriari GH.Shahriari" target="_blank">GH. Shahriari GH. Shahriari | Alimohamadi A. | Safari pour M. | Shahriari GH. | Issue Writer Certificate 

Pages

  17-29

Abstract

 Pardisan Nature Park, the last remaining natural habitat in Tehran and home to 443 indigenous plant species, requires Sustainable management.due to its unique ecological characteristics. Estimating the ecological footprint is an effective method for assessing the ecological status of areas to ensure their optimal use. This study has calculated the quantitative ecological footprint of Pardisan Park using the Component method. The ecological footprint was calculated for five consumption activities: electricity, water, gas, waste, and food. The Biological capacity of different land types; along with Ecological deficit and intensity indices were calculated.The results indicate that the ecological footprints for electricity, water, gas, waste, food, and the total are 121970.15, 86.72, 0.00, 2585.88, 0.00 and 124642.75, respectively. The Biological capacity is measured at 438.47 hectares. The difference between the Biological capacity and the total ecological footprint suggests an Ecological deficit in the consumption sector. The ecological pressure index footprint intensity in the water, waste, and gas sectors is rated at level one (good), while electricity and food are rated at level four (very poor). Hence, park management has demonstrated efficiency in the consumption of water, gas, and waste, but has shown weaknesses in the consumption of electricity and food.

Multimedia

  • No record.
  • Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button