AN INVESTIGATION OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF FOUR-FACTOR ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE SCALE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HASHEMI SHEYKHSHABANI S.E.; RAJABI GHOLAMREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF CAREER & ORGANIZATIONAL COUNSELING Year:2011 | Volume:3 | Issue:7 Page(s): 9-24

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,298

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN INVESTIGATION OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF FOUR-FACTOR ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE SCALE

Author(s)

HASHEMI SHEYKHSHABANI S.E. | RAJABI GHOLAMREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICEQ2

DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICEQ2

PROCEDURAL JUSTICEQ3

INFORMATIONAL JUSTICEQ3

INTERPERSONAL JUSTICEQ2

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE Scale, developed by Colquitt (2001). This scale administered to a sample working in an industrial company in Khozestan province. The sample consisted of 355 employees selected by stratified random sampling method. The scale measures four dimensions of ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE including DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, INFORMATIONAL JUSTICE, and INTERPERSONAL JUSTICE. In the present study, validity of the scale was examined in two ways: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and discriminative construct validity. CFA using AMOS, indicated that four-factor model fit with data better than one, two, and three factor models, and all items loaded on their factor, significantly. In addition, each factor was correlated with theoretically relevant variable. Specifically, DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, INFORMATIONAL JUSTICE, and INTERPERSONAL JUSTICE had significant correlations with instrumentality, group commitment, helping behavior, and collective esteem, respectively. Results of this study provide evidence supporting the validity of the ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE scale and its applicability in Iran.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HASHEMI SHEYKHSHABANI, S.E., & RAJABI, GHOLAMREZA. (2011). AN INVESTIGATION OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF FOUR-FACTOR ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE SCALE. JOURNAL OF CAREER & ORGANIZATIONAL COUNSELING, 3(7), 9-24. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/149521/en

Vancouver: Copy

HASHEMI SHEYKHSHABANI S.E., RAJABI GHOLAMREZA. AN INVESTIGATION OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF FOUR-FACTOR ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE SCALE. JOURNAL OF CAREER & ORGANIZATIONAL COUNSELING[Internet]. 2011;3(7):9-24. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/149521/en

IEEE: Copy

S.E. HASHEMI SHEYKHSHABANI, and GHOLAMREZA RAJABI, “AN INVESTIGATION OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF FOUR-FACTOR ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE SCALE,” JOURNAL OF CAREER & ORGANIZATIONAL COUNSELING, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 9–24, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/149521/en

Related Journal Papers