مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,746
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND MINIMUM DISTANCE TO MEAN CLASSIFIERS IN PREPARING LAND COVER MAP (A CASE STUDY: ISFAHAN AREA)

Pages

  253-264

Abstract

 Land cover maps derived from satellite images play a key role in regional and national LAND COVER assessments. In order to compare maximum likelihood and MINIMUM DISTANCE TO MEAN CLASSIFIERs, LISS-III images from IRS-P6 satellite were acquired in August 2008 from the western part of Isfahan. First, the LISS-III image was georeferenced. The Root Mean Square error of less than one pixel was the result of registration. After creating false color composite and calculating transformed divergence index, the images were classified using maximum likelihood and MINIMUM DISTANCE TO MEAN CLASSIFIERs into six categories including river, bare land, agricultural land, urban area, highway and rocky outcrops. The results of classification showed that the dominant LAND COVER type is urban area, occupying about 6821.1 ha representing 38.86% of total area. The accuracy of maximum likelihood and MINIMUM DISTANCE TO MEAN CLASSIFIERs was obtained using error matrix and Kappa analysis. According to the results, the maximum likelihood algorithm had an overall accuracy of 94.93% and the minimum distance to mean method was 85.25% accurate. The results illustrate that the maximum likelihood method is superior to MINIMUM DISTANCE TO MEAN CLASSIFIER.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SOFFIANIAN, A., & MADANIAN, M.A.. (2011). COMPARISON OF MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND MINIMUM DISTANCE TO MEAN CLASSIFIERS IN PREPARING LAND COVER MAP (A CASE STUDY: ISFAHAN AREA). WATER AND SOIL SCIENCE (JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES), 15(57), 253-264. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/15151/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SOFFIANIAN A., MADANIAN M.A.. COMPARISON OF MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND MINIMUM DISTANCE TO MEAN CLASSIFIERS IN PREPARING LAND COVER MAP (A CASE STUDY: ISFAHAN AREA). WATER AND SOIL SCIENCE (JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES)[Internet]. 2011;15(57):253-264. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/15151/en

    IEEE: Copy

    A. SOFFIANIAN, and M.A. MADANIAN, “COMPARISON OF MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND MINIMUM DISTANCE TO MEAN CLASSIFIERS IN PREPARING LAND COVER MAP (A CASE STUDY: ISFAHAN AREA),” WATER AND SOIL SCIENCE (JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES), vol. 15, no. 57, pp. 253–264, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/15151/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button