مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,023
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE CHANCE OF OCCURRENCE OF RESPIRATORY ASPIRATION BETWEEN TWO TUBE FEEDING METHODS OF INTERMITTENT BOLUS AND INTERMITTENT DRIP BAG

Pages

  11-16

Abstract

 Aims: Aspiration of stomach contents is a serious side effect in patients with a feeding tube which can be prevented otherwise may lead to death. There have been disputes over the safest feeding method. Therefore, this study seeks to identify the chance of occurrence of RESPIRATORY ASPIRATION in two TUBE FEEDING methods of intermittent bolus and intermittent drip bag.Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, 72 patients in ICU and trauma ward who were fed through tube, investigating contextual variables and using gradual method, were divided into two groups of intermittent bolus and INTERMITTENT DRIP BAG METHOD and both groups were independently fed for 3 days. After that, both groups were surveyed and compared based on the level of aspiration occurrence. To collect the data, personal information, nutrition, and respiration form as well as form of information about the two feeding methods in the studied units were utilized. The studied units were selected among Training and Treatment Centers in Rasht in 2010. To analyze the data, descriptive and inferential statistics and SPSS16 software were used.Results: The RESPIRATORY ASPIRATION occurrence level in intermittent bolus TUBE FEEDING methods was 5.6% whereas this amount in INTERMITTENT DRIP BAG METHOD was zero. Fisher exact test revealed that there was no significant relationship between these two groups (p=0.47).Conclusion: As there was no significant relationship in RESPIRATORY ASPIRATION between the two groups, it concluded that INTERMITTENT BOLUS METHOD can still be mentioned in books as a standard method which can decrease the risk of aspiration if it is used properly.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button